How Jungian Cognitive Functions Explain MBTI Type Prevalence in Computer Industry Careers
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866913806627635200 |
|---|---|
| author | VarastehNezhad, Arya Agahi, Behnam Elyasi, Soroush Tavasoli, Reza Farbeh, Hamed |
| author_facet | VarastehNezhad, Arya Agahi, Behnam Elyasi, Soroush Tavasoli, Reza Farbeh, Hamed |
| contents | This study investigates the relationship between Carl Jung's cognitive functions and success in computer industry careers by analyzing the distribution of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) types among professionals in the field. Building on Carl Jung's theory of psychological types, which categorizes human cognition into four primary functions, Sensing, Intuition, Thinking, and Feeling, this study investigates how these functions, when combined with the attitudes of Extraversion and Introversion, influence personality types and career choices in the tech sector. Through a comprehensive analysis of data from 30 studies spanning multiple countries and decades, encompassing 18,264 individuals in computer-related professions, we identified the most prevalent cognitive functions and their combinations. After normalizing the data against general population distributions, our findings showed that individual Jungian functions (Te, Ni, Ti, Ne), dual function combinations (Ni-Te, Ti-Ne, Si-Te, Ni-Fe), and MBTI types (INTJ, ENTJ, INTP, ENTP, ISTJ, INFJ, ESTJ, ESTP) had significantly higher representation compared to general population norms. The paper addresses gaps in the existing literature by providing a more nuanced understanding of how cognitive functions impact job performance and team dynamics, offering insights for career guidance, team composition, and professional development in the computer industry, and a deeper understanding of how cognitive preferences influence career success in technology-related fields. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_17248 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | How Jungian Cognitive Functions Explain MBTI Type Prevalence in Computer Industry Careers VarastehNezhad, Arya Agahi, Behnam Elyasi, Soroush Tavasoli, Reza Farbeh, Hamed Computers and Society This study investigates the relationship between Carl Jung's cognitive functions and success in computer industry careers by analyzing the distribution of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) types among professionals in the field. Building on Carl Jung's theory of psychological types, which categorizes human cognition into four primary functions, Sensing, Intuition, Thinking, and Feeling, this study investigates how these functions, when combined with the attitudes of Extraversion and Introversion, influence personality types and career choices in the tech sector. Through a comprehensive analysis of data from 30 studies spanning multiple countries and decades, encompassing 18,264 individuals in computer-related professions, we identified the most prevalent cognitive functions and their combinations. After normalizing the data against general population distributions, our findings showed that individual Jungian functions (Te, Ni, Ti, Ne), dual function combinations (Ni-Te, Ti-Ne, Si-Te, Ni-Fe), and MBTI types (INTJ, ENTJ, INTP, ENTP, ISTJ, INFJ, ESTJ, ESTP) had significantly higher representation compared to general population norms. The paper addresses gaps in the existing literature by providing a more nuanced understanding of how cognitive functions impact job performance and team dynamics, offering insights for career guidance, team composition, and professional development in the computer industry, and a deeper understanding of how cognitive preferences influence career success in technology-related fields. |
| title | How Jungian Cognitive Functions Explain MBTI Type Prevalence in Computer Industry Careers |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17248 |