Exploring a Large Language Model for Transforming Taxonomic Data into OWL: Lessons Learned and Implications for Ontology Development
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909621816393728 |
|---|---|
| author | Soares, Filipi Miranda Saraiva, Antonio Mauro Pires, Luís Ferreira Santos, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Moreira, Dilvan de Abreu Corrêa, Fernando Elias Braghetto, Kelly Rosa Drucker, Debora Pignatari Delbem, Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo |
| author_facet | Soares, Filipi Miranda Saraiva, Antonio Mauro Pires, Luís Ferreira Santos, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Moreira, Dilvan de Abreu Corrêa, Fernando Elias Braghetto, Kelly Rosa Drucker, Debora Pignatari Delbem, Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo |
| contents | Managing scientific names in ontologies that represent species taxonomies is challenging due to the ever-evolving nature of these taxonomies. Manually maintaining these names becomes increasingly difficult when dealing with thousands of scientific names. To address this issue, this paper investigates the use of ChatGPT-4 to automate the development of the :Organism module in the Agricultural Product Types Ontology (APTO) for species classification. Our methodology involved leveraging ChatGPT-4 to extract data from the GBIF Backbone API and generate OWL files for further integration in APTO. Two alternative approaches were explored: (1) issuing a series of prompts for ChatGPT-4 to execute tasks via the BrowserOP plugin and (2) directing ChatGPT-4 to design a Python algorithm to perform analogous tasks. Both approaches rely on a prompting method where we provide instructions, context, input data, and an output indicator. The first approach showed scalability limitations, while the second approach used the Python algorithm to overcome these challenges, but it struggled with typographical errors in data handling. This study highlights the potential of Large language models like ChatGPT-4 to streamline the management of species names in ontologies. Despite certain limitations, these tools offer promising advancements in automating taxonomy-related tasks and improving the efficiency of ontology development. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_18651 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Exploring a Large Language Model for Transforming Taxonomic Data into OWL: Lessons Learned and Implications for Ontology Development Soares, Filipi Miranda Saraiva, Antonio Mauro Pires, Luís Ferreira Santos, Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Moreira, Dilvan de Abreu Corrêa, Fernando Elias Braghetto, Kelly Rosa Drucker, Debora Pignatari Delbem, Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo Artificial Intelligence Managing scientific names in ontologies that represent species taxonomies is challenging due to the ever-evolving nature of these taxonomies. Manually maintaining these names becomes increasingly difficult when dealing with thousands of scientific names. To address this issue, this paper investigates the use of ChatGPT-4 to automate the development of the :Organism module in the Agricultural Product Types Ontology (APTO) for species classification. Our methodology involved leveraging ChatGPT-4 to extract data from the GBIF Backbone API and generate OWL files for further integration in APTO. Two alternative approaches were explored: (1) issuing a series of prompts for ChatGPT-4 to execute tasks via the BrowserOP plugin and (2) directing ChatGPT-4 to design a Python algorithm to perform analogous tasks. Both approaches rely on a prompting method where we provide instructions, context, input data, and an output indicator. The first approach showed scalability limitations, while the second approach used the Python algorithm to overcome these challenges, but it struggled with typographical errors in data handling. This study highlights the potential of Large language models like ChatGPT-4 to streamline the management of species names in ontologies. Despite certain limitations, these tools offer promising advancements in automating taxonomy-related tasks and improving the efficiency of ontology development. |
| title | Exploring a Large Language Model for Transforming Taxonomic Data into OWL: Lessons Learned and Implications for Ontology Development |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18651 |