Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning in Multi-Goal Spatial Navigation with Autonomous Mobile Robots
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913996445057024 |
|---|---|
| author | Johnson, Brendon Weitzenfeld, Alfredo |
| author_facet | Johnson, Brendon Weitzenfeld, Alfredo |
| contents | Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) is hypothesized to be able to leverage the inherent hierarchy in learning tasks where traditional reinforcement learning (RL) often fails. In this research, HRL is evaluated and contrasted with traditional RL in complex robotic navigation tasks. We evaluate unique characteristics of HRL, including its ability to create sub-goals and the termination functions. We constructed a number of experiments to test: 1) the differences between RL proximal policy optimization (PPO) and HRL, 2) different ways of creating sub-goals in HRL, 3) manual vs automatic sub-goal creation in HRL, and 4) the effects of the frequency of termination on performance in HRL. These experiments highlight the advantages of HRL over RL and how it achieves these advantages. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_18794 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning in Multi-Goal Spatial Navigation with Autonomous Mobile Robots Johnson, Brendon Weitzenfeld, Alfredo Artificial Intelligence Robotics Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) is hypothesized to be able to leverage the inherent hierarchy in learning tasks where traditional reinforcement learning (RL) often fails. In this research, HRL is evaluated and contrasted with traditional RL in complex robotic navigation tasks. We evaluate unique characteristics of HRL, including its ability to create sub-goals and the termination functions. We constructed a number of experiments to test: 1) the differences between RL proximal policy optimization (PPO) and HRL, 2) different ways of creating sub-goals in HRL, 3) manual vs automatic sub-goal creation in HRL, and 4) the effects of the frequency of termination on performance in HRL. These experiments highlight the advantages of HRL over RL and how it achieves these advantages. |
| title | Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning in Multi-Goal Spatial Navigation with Autonomous Mobile Robots |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Robotics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18794 |