Adaptive Helpfulness-Harmlessness Alignment with Preference Vectors

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Ren-Wei, Hsu, Chin-Ting, Yu, Chan-Hung, Agrawal, Saransh, Huang, Shih-Cheng, Lin, Chieh-Yen, Chen, Shang-Tse, Huang, Kuan-Hao, Sun, Shao-Hua
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866908810356981760
author Liang, Ren-Wei
Hsu, Chin-Ting
Yu, Chan-Hung
Agrawal, Saransh
Huang, Shih-Cheng
Lin, Chieh-Yen
Chen, Shang-Tse
Huang, Kuan-Hao
Sun, Shao-Hua
author_facet Liang, Ren-Wei
Hsu, Chin-Ting
Yu, Chan-Hung
Agrawal, Saransh
Huang, Shih-Cheng
Lin, Chieh-Yen
Chen, Shang-Tse
Huang, Kuan-Hao
Sun, Shao-Hua
contents Ensuring that large language models (LLMs) are both helpful and harmless is a critical challenge, as overly strict constraints can lead to excessive refusals, while permissive models risk generating harmful content. Existing approaches, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and direct preference optimization (DPO), attempt to balance these trade-offs but suffer from performance conflicts, limited controllability, and poor extendability. To address these issues, we propose Preference Vector, a novel framework inspired by task arithmetic. Instead of optimizing multiple preferences within a single objective, we train separate models on individual preferences, extract behavior shifts as preference vectors, and dynamically merge them at test time. This modular approach enables fine-grained, user-controllable preference adjustments and facilitates seamless integration of new preferences without retraining. Experiments show that our proposed Preference Vector framework improves helpfulness without excessive conservatism, allows smooth control over preference trade-offs, and supports scalable multi-preference alignment.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2504_20106
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Adaptive Helpfulness-Harmlessness Alignment with Preference Vectors
Liang, Ren-Wei
Hsu, Chin-Ting
Yu, Chan-Hung
Agrawal, Saransh
Huang, Shih-Cheng
Lin, Chieh-Yen
Chen, Shang-Tse
Huang, Kuan-Hao
Sun, Shao-Hua
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Ensuring that large language models (LLMs) are both helpful and harmless is a critical challenge, as overly strict constraints can lead to excessive refusals, while permissive models risk generating harmful content. Existing approaches, such as reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and direct preference optimization (DPO), attempt to balance these trade-offs but suffer from performance conflicts, limited controllability, and poor extendability. To address these issues, we propose Preference Vector, a novel framework inspired by task arithmetic. Instead of optimizing multiple preferences within a single objective, we train separate models on individual preferences, extract behavior shifts as preference vectors, and dynamically merge them at test time. This modular approach enables fine-grained, user-controllable preference adjustments and facilitates seamless integration of new preferences without retraining. Experiments show that our proposed Preference Vector framework improves helpfulness without excessive conservatism, allows smooth control over preference trade-offs, and supports scalable multi-preference alignment.
title Adaptive Helpfulness-Harmlessness Alignment with Preference Vectors
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20106