Cover Image

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Tire, Kutay, Çakar, Berk, Tüzün, Eray
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

PR-Aware Automated Unit Test Generation: Challenges and Opportunities
by: Haratian, Vahid, et al.
Published: (2026)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Factors Influencing the Quality of AI-Generated Code: A Synthesis of Empirical Evidence
by: Geruslu, Vehid, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)

Agents in the Sandbox: End-to-End Crash Bug Reproduction for Minecraft
by: Yapağcı, Eray, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluation of LLM-Based Software Engineering Tools: Practices, Challenges, and Future Directions
by: Torun, Utku Boran, et al.
Published: (2026)

Towards Automated Detection of Inline Code Comment Smells
by: Oztas, Ipek, et al.
Published: (2025)

Automated Classification of Human Code Review Comments with Large Language Models
by: Çağlar, Semih, et al.
Published: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Review
by: Cihan, Umut, et al.
Published: (2025)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)

RefExpo: Unveiling Software Project Structures through Advanced Dependency Graph Extraction
by: Haratian, Vahid, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

ImproBR: Bug Report Improver Using LLMs
by: Akyol, Emre Furkan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Beyond Bug Fixes: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Merge Code Quality Issues in Agent-Generated Pull Requests
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2026)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
by: Pham, Dung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Understanding the Limits of Automated Evaluation for Code Review Bots in Practice
by: Karakaya, Veli, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

Automatic Pull Request Description Generation Using LLMs: A T5 Model Approach
by: Sakib, Md Nazmus, et al.
Published: (2024)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

Towards the Systematic Testing of Regular Expression Engines
by: Çakar, Berk, et al.
Published: (2026)

Past, Present, and Future of Bug Tracking in the Generative AI Era
by: Torun, Utku Boran, et al.
Published: (2025)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Published: (2026)

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback
by: Kumar, Deepak
Published: (2026)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Rethinking Code Review in the Age of AI: A Vision for Agentic Code Review
by: Kamalı, Hüseyin Özgür, et al.
Published: (2026)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
by: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Published: (2025)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
by: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Learning to Commit: Generating Organic Pull Requests via Online Repository Memory
by: Li, Mo, et al.
Published: (2026)

Automated Root-Cause Subclassification and No-Code Fix Generation for Invalid Bug Reports
by: Gon, Mahmut Furkan, et al.
Published: (2026)

How AI Coding Agents Communicate: A Study of Pull Request Description Characteristics and Human Review Responses
by: Watanabe, Kan, et al.
Published: (2026)

Bus Factor Explorer
by: Klimov, Egor, et al.
Published: (2024)

Early-Stage Prediction of Review Effort in AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Minh, Dao Sy Duy, et al.
Published: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
by: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Published: (2025)