Cover Image

Humans can learn to detect AI-generated texts, or at least learn when they can't

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Milička, Jiří, Marklová, Anna, Drobil, Ondřej, Pospíšilová, Eva
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Benchmark of stylistic variation in LLM-generated texts
by: Milička, Jiří, et al.
Published: (2025)

AI Brown and AI Koditex: LLM-Generated Corpora Comparable to Traditional Corpora of English and Czech Texts
by: Milička, Jiří, et al.
Published: (2025)

The author is dead, but what if they never lived? A reception experiment on Czech AI- and human-authored poetry
by: Marklová, Anna, et al.
Published: (2025)

Iconicity in Large Language Models
by: Marklová, Anna, et al.
Published: (2025)

Sydney Telling Fables on AI and Humans: A Corpus Tracing Memetic Transfer of Persona between LLMs
by: Milička, Jiří, et al.
Published: (2026)

No Need for Explanations: LLMs can implicitly learn from mistakes in-context
by: Alazraki, Lisa, et al.
Published: (2025)

ReadCtrl: Personalizing text generation with readability-controlled instruction learning
by: Tran, Hieu, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs can hide text in other text of the same length
by: Norelli, Antonio, et al.
Published: (2025)

Why can't Epidemiology be automated (yet)?
by: Bann, David, et al.
Published: (2025)

Theoretical and Methodological Framework for Studying Texts Produced by Large Language Models
by: Milička, Jiří
Published: (2024)

Simple stochastic processes behind Menzerath's Law
by: Milička, Jiří
Published: (2024)

MedReadCtrl: Personalizing medical text generation with readability-controlled instruction learning
by: Tran, Hieu, et al.
Published: (2025)

Not all tokens are created equal: Perplexity Attention Weighted Networks for AI generated text detection
by: Miralles-González, Pablo, et al.
Published: (2025)

Are generative AI text annotations systematically biased?
by: Stolwijk, Sjoerd B., et al.
Published: (2025)

Kill two birds with one stone: generalized and robust AI-generated text detection via dynamic perturbations
by: Zhou, Yinghan, et al.
Published: (2025)

<think> So let's replace this phrase with insult... </think> Lessons learned from generation of toxic texts with LLMs
by: Pletenev, Sergey, et al.
Published: (2025)

Chain-of-Description: What I can understand, I can put into words
by: Guo, Jiaxin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Large Language Models can Strategically Deceive their Users when Put Under Pressure
by: Scheurer, Jérémy, et al.
Published: (2023)

Large language models can learn and generalize steganographic chain-of-thought under process supervision
by: Skaf, Joey, et al.
Published: (2025)

Large Language Models can be Guided to Evade AI-Generated Text Detection
by: Lu, Ning, et al.
Published: (2023)

ARC-Encoder: learning compressed text representations for large language models
by: Pilchen, Hippolyte, et al.
Published: (2025)

What can large language models do for sustainable food?
by: Thomas, Anna T., et al.
Published: (2025)

Large language models can consistently generate high-quality content for election disinformation operations
by: Williams, Angus R., et al.
Published: (2024)

Small Language Models can Outperform Humans in Short Creative Writing: A Study Comparing SLMs with Humans and LLMs
by: Marco, Guillermo, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs can be easily Confused by Instructional Distractions
by: Hwang, Yerin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Large Language Models can Learn Rules
by: Zhu, Zhaocheng, et al.
Published: (2023)

Automated Evaluation can Distinguish the Good and Bad AI Responses to Patient Questions about Hospitalization
by: Soni, Sarvesh, et al.
Published: (2025)

AI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on Evaluations
by: van der Weij, Teun, et al.
Published: (2024)

How well can LLMs Grade Essays in Arabic?
by: Ghazawi, Rayed, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can professional translators identify machine-generated text?
by: Farrell, Michael
Published: (2026)

Language Models can Evaluate Themselves via Probability Discrepancy
by: Xia, Tingyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Looks can be Deceptive: Distinguishing Repetition Disfluency from Reduplication
by: Ahmad, Arif, et al.
Published: (2024)

People who frequently use ChatGPT for writing tasks are accurate and robust detectors of AI-generated text
by: Russell, Jenna, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can postgraduate translation students identify machine-generated text?
by: Farrell, Michael
Published: (2025)

Differentially-private text generation degrades output language quality
by: Çano, Erion, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Single Character can Make or Break Your LLM Evals
by: Su, Jingtong, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLMs can Find Mathematical Reasoning Mistakes by Pedagogical Chain-of-Thought
by: Jiang, Zhuoxuan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Ensemble BERT: A student social network text sentiment classification model based on ensemble learning and BERT architecture
by: Jiang, Kai, et al.
Published: (2024)

Cognitive models can reveal interpretable value trade-offs in language models
by: Murthy, Sonia K., et al.
Published: (2025)

Language Models can perform Single-Utterance Self-Correction of Perturbed Reasoning
by: Silver, Sam, et al.
Published: (2025)