Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01980 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866908349627367424 |
|---|---|
| author | Guidroz, Theo Ardila, Diego Li, Jimmy Mansour, Adam Jhun, Paul Gonzalez, Nina Ji, Xiang Sanchez, Mike Kakarmath, Sujay Bellaiche, Mathias MJ Garrido, Miguel Ángel Ahmed, Faruk Choudhary, Divyansh Hartford, Jay Xu, Chenwei Echeverria, Henry Javier Serrano Wang, Yifan Shaffer, Jeff Eric Cao Matias, Yossi Hassidim, Avinatan Webster, Dale R Liu, Yun Fujiwara, Sho Bui, Peggy Duong, Quang |
| author_facet | Guidroz, Theo Ardila, Diego Li, Jimmy Mansour, Adam Jhun, Paul Gonzalez, Nina Ji, Xiang Sanchez, Mike Kakarmath, Sujay Bellaiche, Mathias MJ Garrido, Miguel Ángel Ahmed, Faruk Choudhary, Divyansh Hartford, Jay Xu, Chenwei Echeverria, Henry Javier Serrano Wang, Yifan Shaffer, Jeff Eric Cao Matias, Yossi Hassidim, Avinatan Webster, Dale R Liu, Yun Fujiwara, Sho Bui, Peggy Duong, Quang |
| contents | Information on the web, such as scientific publications and Wikipedia, often surpasses users' reading level. To help address this, we used a self-refinement approach to develop a LLM capability for minimally lossy text simplification. To validate our approach, we conducted a randomized study involving 4563 participants and 31 texts spanning 6 broad subject areas: PubMed (biomedical scientific articles), biology, law, finance, literature/philosophy, and aerospace/computer science. Participants were randomized to viewing original or simplified texts in a subject area, and answered multiple-choice questions (MCQs) that tested their comprehension of the text. The participants were also asked to provide qualitative feedback such as task difficulty. Our results indicate that participants who read the simplified text answered more MCQs correctly than their counterparts who read the original text (3.9% absolute increase, p<0.05). This gain was most striking with PubMed (14.6%), while more moderate gains were observed for finance (5.5%), aerospace/computer science (3.8%) domains, and legal (3.5%). Notably, the results were robust to whether participants could refer back to the text while answering MCQs. The absolute accuracy decreased by up to ~9% for both original and simplified setups where participants could not refer back to the text, but the ~4% overall improvement persisted. Finally, participants' self-reported perceived ease based on a simplified NASA Task Load Index was greater for those who read the simplified text (absolute change on a 5-point scale 0.33, p<0.05). This randomized study, involving an order of magnitude more participants than prior works, demonstrates the potential of LLMs to make complex information easier to understand. Our work aims to enable a broader audience to better learn and make use of expert knowledge available on the web, improving information accessibility. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_01980 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | LLM-based Text Simplification and its Effect on User Comprehension and Cognitive Load Guidroz, Theo Ardila, Diego Li, Jimmy Mansour, Adam Jhun, Paul Gonzalez, Nina Ji, Xiang Sanchez, Mike Kakarmath, Sujay Bellaiche, Mathias MJ Garrido, Miguel Ángel Ahmed, Faruk Choudhary, Divyansh Hartford, Jay Xu, Chenwei Echeverria, Henry Javier Serrano Wang, Yifan Shaffer, Jeff Eric Cao Matias, Yossi Hassidim, Avinatan Webster, Dale R Liu, Yun Fujiwara, Sho Bui, Peggy Duong, Quang Computation and Language Information on the web, such as scientific publications and Wikipedia, often surpasses users' reading level. To help address this, we used a self-refinement approach to develop a LLM capability for minimally lossy text simplification. To validate our approach, we conducted a randomized study involving 4563 participants and 31 texts spanning 6 broad subject areas: PubMed (biomedical scientific articles), biology, law, finance, literature/philosophy, and aerospace/computer science. Participants were randomized to viewing original or simplified texts in a subject area, and answered multiple-choice questions (MCQs) that tested their comprehension of the text. The participants were also asked to provide qualitative feedback such as task difficulty. Our results indicate that participants who read the simplified text answered more MCQs correctly than their counterparts who read the original text (3.9% absolute increase, p<0.05). This gain was most striking with PubMed (14.6%), while more moderate gains were observed for finance (5.5%), aerospace/computer science (3.8%) domains, and legal (3.5%). Notably, the results were robust to whether participants could refer back to the text while answering MCQs. The absolute accuracy decreased by up to ~9% for both original and simplified setups where participants could not refer back to the text, but the ~4% overall improvement persisted. Finally, participants' self-reported perceived ease based on a simplified NASA Task Load Index was greater for those who read the simplified text (absolute change on a 5-point scale 0.33, p<0.05). This randomized study, involving an order of magnitude more participants than prior works, demonstrates the potential of LLMs to make complex information easier to understand. Our work aims to enable a broader audience to better learn and make use of expert knowledge available on the web, improving information accessibility. |
| title | LLM-based Text Simplification and its Effect on User Comprehension and Cognitive Load |
| topic | Computation and Language |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01980 |