Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ho, Justin, Colby, Alexandra, Fisher, William
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02164
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915273037053952
author Ho, Justin
Colby, Alexandra
Fisher, William
author_facet Ho, Justin
Colby, Alexandra
Fisher, William
contents This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law. Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability. Our prototype models legal precedents at the statutory factor level (e.g., purpose, nature, amount, market effect) and incorporates citation-weighted graph representations to prioritize doctrinally authoritative sources. We use Chain-of-Thought reasoning and interleaved retrieval steps to better emulate legal reasoning. Preliminary testing suggests this method improves doctrinal relevance in the retrieval process, laying groundwork for future evaluation and deployment of LLM-based legal assistance tools.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_02164
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use
Ho, Justin
Colby, Alexandra
Fisher, William
Computation and Language
I.2.7; K.5; H.3.3
This paper presents a domain-specific implementation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) tailored to the Fair Use Doctrine in U.S. copyright law. Motivated by the increasing prevalence of DMCA takedowns and the lack of accessible legal support for content creators, we propose a structured approach that combines semantic search with legal knowledge graphs and court citation networks to improve retrieval quality and reasoning reliability. Our prototype models legal precedents at the statutory factor level (e.g., purpose, nature, amount, market effect) and incorporates citation-weighted graph representations to prioritize doctrinally authoritative sources. We use Chain-of-Thought reasoning and interleaved retrieval steps to better emulate legal reasoning. Preliminary testing suggests this method improves doctrinal relevance in the retrieval process, laying groundwork for future evaluation and deployment of LLM-based legal assistance tools.
title Incorporating Legal Structure in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Case Study on Copyright Fair Use
topic Computation and Language
I.2.7; K.5; H.3.3
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02164