The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project VII: Satellite quenching in zoom-in simulation of a Milky Way-mass halo

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Cardoso, R., Roca-Fàbrega, S., Jung, Minyong, Nguyen, Thinh H., Kim, Ji-hoon, Primack, Joel, Agertz, Oscar, Barrow, Kirk S. S., Gallego, Jesus, Nagamine, Kentaro, Powell, Johnny W., Revaz, Yves, Velázquez, Hector, Genina, Anna, Kim, Hyeonyong, Lupi, Alessandro, Abel, Tom, Cen, Renyue, Ceverino, Daniel, Dekel, Avishai, Oh, Boon Kiat, Quinn, Thomas R.
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866908420036100096
author Rodríguez-Cardoso, R.
Roca-Fàbrega, S.
Jung, Minyong
Nguyen, Thinh H.
Kim, Ji-hoon
Primack, Joel
Agertz, Oscar
Barrow, Kirk S. S.
Gallego, Jesus
Nagamine, Kentaro
Powell, Johnny W.
Revaz, Yves
Velázquez, Hector
Genina, Anna
Kim, Hyeonyong
Lupi, Alessandro
Abel, Tom
Cen, Renyue
Ceverino, Daniel
Dekel, Avishai
Oh, Boon Kiat
Quinn, Thomas R.
author_facet Rodríguez-Cardoso, R.
Roca-Fàbrega, S.
Jung, Minyong
Nguyen, Thinh H.
Kim, Ji-hoon
Primack, Joel
Agertz, Oscar
Barrow, Kirk S. S.
Gallego, Jesus
Nagamine, Kentaro
Powell, Johnny W.
Revaz, Yves
Velázquez, Hector
Genina, Anna
Kim, Hyeonyong
Lupi, Alessandro
Abel, Tom
Cen, Renyue
Ceverino, Daniel
Dekel, Avishai
Oh, Boon Kiat
Quinn, Thomas R.
contents Context: Satellite galaxies experience multiple physical processes when interacting with their host halos, often leading to the quenching of star formation. In the Local Group (LG), satellite quenching has been shown to be highly efficient, affecting nearly all satellites except the most massive ones. While recent surveys are studying Milky Way (MW) analogs to assess how representative our LG is, the dominant physical mechanisms behind satellite quenching in MW-mass halos remain under debate. Aims: We analyze satellite quenching within the same MW-mass halo, simulated using various widely-used astrophysical codes, each using different hydrodynamic methods and implementing different supernovae feedback recipes. The goal is to determine whether quenched fractions, quenching timescales and the dominant quenching mechanisms are consistent across codes or if they show sensitivity to the specific hydrodynamic method and supernovae (SNe) feedback physics employed. Methods: We use a subset of high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations of a MW-mass halo from the multiple-code AGORA CosmoRun suite. Results: We find that the quenched fraction is consistent with the latest SAGA survey results within its 1$σ$ host-to-host scatter across all the models. Regarding quenching timescales, all the models reproduce the trend observed in the ELVES survey, LG observations, and previous simulations: the less massive the satellite, the shorter its quenching timescale. All our models converge on the dominant quenching mechanisms: strangulation halts cold gas accretion and ram pressure stripping is the predominant mechanism for gas removal, particularly effective in satellites with $M_* < 10^8\, M_\odot$. Nevertheless, the efficiency of the stripping mechanisms differs among the codes, showing a strong sensitivity to the different SNe feedback implementations and/or hydrodynamic methods employed.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_05844
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project VII: Satellite quenching in zoom-in simulation of a Milky Way-mass halo
Rodríguez-Cardoso, R.
Roca-Fàbrega, S.
Jung, Minyong
Nguyen, Thinh H.
Kim, Ji-hoon
Primack, Joel
Agertz, Oscar
Barrow, Kirk S. S.
Gallego, Jesus
Nagamine, Kentaro
Powell, Johnny W.
Revaz, Yves
Velázquez, Hector
Genina, Anna
Kim, Hyeonyong
Lupi, Alessandro
Abel, Tom
Cen, Renyue
Ceverino, Daniel
Dekel, Avishai
Oh, Boon Kiat
Quinn, Thomas R.
Astrophysics of Galaxies
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Context: Satellite galaxies experience multiple physical processes when interacting with their host halos, often leading to the quenching of star formation. In the Local Group (LG), satellite quenching has been shown to be highly efficient, affecting nearly all satellites except the most massive ones. While recent surveys are studying Milky Way (MW) analogs to assess how representative our LG is, the dominant physical mechanisms behind satellite quenching in MW-mass halos remain under debate. Aims: We analyze satellite quenching within the same MW-mass halo, simulated using various widely-used astrophysical codes, each using different hydrodynamic methods and implementing different supernovae feedback recipes. The goal is to determine whether quenched fractions, quenching timescales and the dominant quenching mechanisms are consistent across codes or if they show sensitivity to the specific hydrodynamic method and supernovae (SNe) feedback physics employed. Methods: We use a subset of high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulations of a MW-mass halo from the multiple-code AGORA CosmoRun suite. Results: We find that the quenched fraction is consistent with the latest SAGA survey results within its 1$σ$ host-to-host scatter across all the models. Regarding quenching timescales, all the models reproduce the trend observed in the ELVES survey, LG observations, and previous simulations: the less massive the satellite, the shorter its quenching timescale. All our models converge on the dominant quenching mechanisms: strangulation halts cold gas accretion and ram pressure stripping is the predominant mechanism for gas removal, particularly effective in satellites with $M_* < 10^8\, M_\odot$. Nevertheless, the efficiency of the stripping mechanisms differs among the codes, showing a strong sensitivity to the different SNe feedback implementations and/or hydrodynamic methods employed.
title The AGORA High-Resolution Galaxy Simulations Comparison Project VII: Satellite quenching in zoom-in simulation of a Milky Way-mass halo
topic Astrophysics of Galaxies
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05844