Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhao, Fei, Zhang, Runlin, Zhang, Chengcui, Saxena, Nitesh
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07032
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916783721545728
author Zhao, Fei
Zhang, Runlin
Zhang, Chengcui
Saxena, Nitesh
author_facet Zhao, Fei
Zhang, Runlin
Zhang, Chengcui
Saxena, Nitesh
contents We present MarkMatch, a retrieval system for detecting whether two paper ballot marks were filled by the same hand. Unlike the previous SOTA method BubbleSig, which used binary classification on isolated mark pairs, MarkMatch ranks stylistic similarity between a query mark and a mark in the database using contrastive learning. Our model is trained with a dense batch similarity matrix and a dual loss objective. Each sample is contrasted against many negatives within each batch, enabling the model to learn subtle handwriting difference and improve generalization under handwriting variation and visual noise, while diagonal supervision reinforces high confidence on true matches. The model achieves an F1 score of 0.943, surpassing BubbleSig's best performance. MarkMatch also integrates Segment Anything Model for flexible mark extraction via box- or point-based prompts. The system offers election auditors a practical tool for visual, non-biometric investigation of suspicious ballots.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_07032
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MarkMatch: Same-Hand Stuffing Detection
Zhao, Fei
Zhang, Runlin
Zhang, Chengcui
Saxena, Nitesh
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
We present MarkMatch, a retrieval system for detecting whether two paper ballot marks were filled by the same hand. Unlike the previous SOTA method BubbleSig, which used binary classification on isolated mark pairs, MarkMatch ranks stylistic similarity between a query mark and a mark in the database using contrastive learning. Our model is trained with a dense batch similarity matrix and a dual loss objective. Each sample is contrasted against many negatives within each batch, enabling the model to learn subtle handwriting difference and improve generalization under handwriting variation and visual noise, while diagonal supervision reinforces high confidence on true matches. The model achieves an F1 score of 0.943, surpassing BubbleSig's best performance. MarkMatch also integrates Segment Anything Model for flexible mark extraction via box- or point-based prompts. The system offers election auditors a practical tool for visual, non-biometric investigation of suspicious ballots.
title MarkMatch: Same-Hand Stuffing Detection
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07032