Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07454 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866917101685440512 |
|---|---|
| author | White, O. Buisseret, F. Dierick, F. Boulanger, N. |
| author_facet | White, O. Buisseret, F. Dierick, F. Boulanger, N. |
| contents | Optimal Feedback Control (OFC) provides a theoretical framework for goal-directed movements, where the nervous system adjusts actions based on sensory feedback. In OFC, the central nervous system (CNS) not only reacts to stimuli but proactively predicts and adjusts motor commands, minimizing errors and (often energetic) costs through internal models. OFC theory assumes that there exists a cost function that is optimized throughout one's movement. It is natural to assume that mechanical quantities should be involved in cost functions. This does not imply that the mechanical principles that govern human voluntary movements are necessarily Newtonian. Indeed, the undisputed efficiency of Newtonian mechanics to model and predict the motion of non-living systems does not guarantee its relevance to model human behavior. We propose that integrating principles from Lagrangian and Hamiltonian higher-derivative mechanics, i.e. dynamical models that go beyond Newtonian mechanics, provides a more natural framework to study the constraints hidden in human voluntary movement within OFC theory. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_07454 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | From Brain to Motion: Harnessing Higher-Derivative Mechanics for Neural Control White, O. Buisseret, F. Dierick, F. Boulanger, N. Neurons and Cognition Classical Physics Optimal Feedback Control (OFC) provides a theoretical framework for goal-directed movements, where the nervous system adjusts actions based on sensory feedback. In OFC, the central nervous system (CNS) not only reacts to stimuli but proactively predicts and adjusts motor commands, minimizing errors and (often energetic) costs through internal models. OFC theory assumes that there exists a cost function that is optimized throughout one's movement. It is natural to assume that mechanical quantities should be involved in cost functions. This does not imply that the mechanical principles that govern human voluntary movements are necessarily Newtonian. Indeed, the undisputed efficiency of Newtonian mechanics to model and predict the motion of non-living systems does not guarantee its relevance to model human behavior. We propose that integrating principles from Lagrangian and Hamiltonian higher-derivative mechanics, i.e. dynamical models that go beyond Newtonian mechanics, provides a more natural framework to study the constraints hidden in human voluntary movement within OFC theory. |
| title | From Brain to Motion: Harnessing Higher-Derivative Mechanics for Neural Control |
| topic | Neurons and Cognition Classical Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07454 |