Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09044 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866913836455428096 |
|---|---|
| author | Spurin, Catherine Callas, Catherine Kurotori, Takeshi Tchelepi, Hamdi A. Benson, Sally M. |
| author_facet | Spurin, Catherine Callas, Catherine Kurotori, Takeshi Tchelepi, Hamdi A. Benson, Sally M. |
| contents | Understanding the migration and trapping of CO$_2$ in the subsurface is vital to geologic carbon storage projects. Traditional characterization methods employ steady-state co-injection experiments to determine relative permeability and trapping efficiency. Although laboratory studies aim to replicate reservoir conditions, co-injection experiments are often selected because they facilitate steady-state flow and reduce capillary end effects. The fundamental influence of this experimental design choice on measured petrophysical parameters remains inadequately characterized. This study presents a comparative analysis between co-injection and single-phase injection experiments, specifically investigating how experimental methodology influences both trapping efficiency and pressure differential across the core sample (which is used to calculate relative permeability). Our results demonstrate significant variations in trapping behavior between these injection techniques, suggesting that the traditional focus on co-injection experiments may overlook important physical flow phenomena. Differences between injection techniques could be strategically exploited in field applications to enhance residual trapping capacity in subsurface CO$_2$ storage operations. This work highlights the importance of understanding experimental artifacts in core flooding studies and their potential applications for improving carbon storage efficiency. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_09044 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Sensitivity of Trapping Efficiency and Relative Permeability to Experimental Methodology in Laboratory Core Flooding Spurin, Catherine Callas, Catherine Kurotori, Takeshi Tchelepi, Hamdi A. Benson, Sally M. Geophysics Understanding the migration and trapping of CO$_2$ in the subsurface is vital to geologic carbon storage projects. Traditional characterization methods employ steady-state co-injection experiments to determine relative permeability and trapping efficiency. Although laboratory studies aim to replicate reservoir conditions, co-injection experiments are often selected because they facilitate steady-state flow and reduce capillary end effects. The fundamental influence of this experimental design choice on measured petrophysical parameters remains inadequately characterized. This study presents a comparative analysis between co-injection and single-phase injection experiments, specifically investigating how experimental methodology influences both trapping efficiency and pressure differential across the core sample (which is used to calculate relative permeability). Our results demonstrate significant variations in trapping behavior between these injection techniques, suggesting that the traditional focus on co-injection experiments may overlook important physical flow phenomena. Differences between injection techniques could be strategically exploited in field applications to enhance residual trapping capacity in subsurface CO$_2$ storage operations. This work highlights the importance of understanding experimental artifacts in core flooding studies and their potential applications for improving carbon storage efficiency. |
| title | Sensitivity of Trapping Efficiency and Relative Permeability to Experimental Methodology in Laboratory Core Flooding |
| topic | Geophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09044 |