The Nexus of Money and Political Legitimacy: A Comparative Analysis of Democracies and Non-Democracies

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy, Balaraman, Krishna Kumar
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916736901578752
author Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy
Balaraman, Krishna Kumar
author_facet Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy
Balaraman, Krishna Kumar
contents This article examines the complex relationship between money and political legitimacy in democracies (United States, Germany, India) and nondemocracies (China, Russia), using published empirical evidence to explore how financial resources influence governance. In democracies, US campaign finance, German party funding, and Indias electoral bonds amplify elite influence, openly eroding public trust by skewing policy toward wealthy interests. In nondemocracies, Chinas state enterprise patronage and Russias oligarch suppression strengthen legitimacy, yet hide vulnerabilities revealed by anticorruption campaigns and power struggles. The analysis argues that moneys corrosive impact is widespread but varies: democracies face evident legitimacy crises, while nondemocracies conceal underlying fragility. These findings highlight the need for reforms: increased transparency in democracies and wider power bases in nondemocracies, to mitigate moneys distorting effect on political authority.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_09128
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle The Nexus of Money and Political Legitimacy: A Comparative Analysis of Democracies and Non-Democracies
Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy
Balaraman, Krishna Kumar
General Economics
Economics
This article examines the complex relationship between money and political legitimacy in democracies (United States, Germany, India) and nondemocracies (China, Russia), using published empirical evidence to explore how financial resources influence governance. In democracies, US campaign finance, German party funding, and Indias electoral bonds amplify elite influence, openly eroding public trust by skewing policy toward wealthy interests. In nondemocracies, Chinas state enterprise patronage and Russias oligarch suppression strengthen legitimacy, yet hide vulnerabilities revealed by anticorruption campaigns and power struggles. The analysis argues that moneys corrosive impact is widespread but varies: democracies face evident legitimacy crises, while nondemocracies conceal underlying fragility. These findings highlight the need for reforms: increased transparency in democracies and wider power bases in nondemocracies, to mitigate moneys distorting effect on political authority.
title The Nexus of Money and Political Legitimacy: A Comparative Analysis of Democracies and Non-Democracies
topic General Economics
Economics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09128