DRA-GRPO: Your GRPO Needs to Know Diverse Reasoning Paths for Mathematical Reasoning

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Chen, Xiwen, Zhu, Wenhui, Qiu, Peijie, Dong, Xuanzhao, Wang, Hao, Wu, Haiyu, Li, Huayu, Sotiras, Aristeidis, Wang, Yalin, Razi, Abolfazl
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866908857454821376
author Chen, Xiwen
Zhu, Wenhui
Qiu, Peijie
Dong, Xuanzhao
Wang, Hao
Wu, Haiyu
Li, Huayu
Sotiras, Aristeidis
Wang, Yalin
Razi, Abolfazl
author_facet Chen, Xiwen
Zhu, Wenhui
Qiu, Peijie
Dong, Xuanzhao
Wang, Hao
Wu, Haiyu
Li, Huayu
Sotiras, Aristeidis
Wang, Yalin
Razi, Abolfazl
contents Post-training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning, specifically Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing mathematical reasoning. However, standard GRPO relies on scalar correctness rewards that are often non-injective with respect to semantic content: distinct reasoning paths receive identical rewards. This leads to a Diversity-Quality Inconsistency, where the policy collapses into a narrow set of dominant modes while ignoring equally valid but structurally novel strategies. To bridge this gap, we propose Diversity-aware Reward Adjustment (DRA), a theoretically grounded framework that calibrates the reward signal using the semantic density of sampled groups. By leveraging Submodular Mutual Information (SMI), DRA implements an Inverse Propensity Scoring (IPS) mechanism that effectively de-biases the gradient estimation. This creates a repulsive force against redundancy, driving the policy to achieve better coverage of the high-reward landscape. Our method is plug-and-play and integrates seamlessly with GRPO variants. Empirical evaluations on five math benchmarks demonstrate that DRA-GRPO consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving an average accuracy of 58.2% on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B with only 7,000 training samples and $55 cost, highlighting the critical role of diversity calibration in data-efficient alignment. The code is available at https://github.com/xiwenc1/DRA-GRPO.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_09655
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle DRA-GRPO: Your GRPO Needs to Know Diverse Reasoning Paths for Mathematical Reasoning
Chen, Xiwen
Zhu, Wenhui
Qiu, Peijie
Dong, Xuanzhao
Wang, Hao
Wu, Haiyu
Li, Huayu
Sotiras, Aristeidis
Wang, Yalin
Razi, Abolfazl
Computation and Language
Machine Learning
Post-training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning, specifically Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), has emerged as a paradigm for enhancing mathematical reasoning. However, standard GRPO relies on scalar correctness rewards that are often non-injective with respect to semantic content: distinct reasoning paths receive identical rewards. This leads to a Diversity-Quality Inconsistency, where the policy collapses into a narrow set of dominant modes while ignoring equally valid but structurally novel strategies. To bridge this gap, we propose Diversity-aware Reward Adjustment (DRA), a theoretically grounded framework that calibrates the reward signal using the semantic density of sampled groups. By leveraging Submodular Mutual Information (SMI), DRA implements an Inverse Propensity Scoring (IPS) mechanism that effectively de-biases the gradient estimation. This creates a repulsive force against redundancy, driving the policy to achieve better coverage of the high-reward landscape. Our method is plug-and-play and integrates seamlessly with GRPO variants. Empirical evaluations on five math benchmarks demonstrate that DRA-GRPO consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving an average accuracy of 58.2% on DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B with only 7,000 training samples and $55 cost, highlighting the critical role of diversity calibration in data-efficient alignment. The code is available at https://github.com/xiwenc1/DRA-GRPO.
title DRA-GRPO: Your GRPO Needs to Know Diverse Reasoning Paths for Mathematical Reasoning
topic Computation and Language
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09655