Relative Drawing Identification Complexity is Invariant to Modality in Vision-Language Models

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas, Diogo, Håvardstun, Brigt, Ferri, Cèsar, Garigliotti, Darío, Telle, Jan Arne, Hernández-Orallo, José
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866912557409763328
author Freitas, Diogo
Håvardstun, Brigt
Ferri, Cèsar
Garigliotti, Darío
Telle, Jan Arne
Hernández-Orallo, José
author_facet Freitas, Diogo
Håvardstun, Brigt
Ferri, Cèsar
Garigliotti, Darío
Telle, Jan Arne
Hernández-Orallo, José
contents Large language models have become multimodal, and many of them are said to integrate their modalities using common representations. If this were true, a drawing of a car as an image, for instance, should map to a similar area in the latent space as a textual description of the strokes that form the drawing. To explore this in a black-box access regime to these models, we propose the use of machine teaching, a theory that studies the minimal set of examples a teacher needs to choose so that the learner captures the concept. In this paper, we evaluate the complexity of teaching vision-language models a subset of objects in the Quick, Draw! dataset using two presentations: raw images as bitmaps and trace coordinates in TikZ format. The results indicate that image-based representations generally require fewer segments and achieve higher accuracy than coordinate-based representations. But, surprisingly, the teaching size usually ranks concepts similarly across both modalities, even when controlling for (a human proxy of) concept priors, suggesting that the simplicity of concepts may be an inherent property that transcends modality representations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_10583
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Relative Drawing Identification Complexity is Invariant to Modality in Vision-Language Models
Freitas, Diogo
Håvardstun, Brigt
Ferri, Cèsar
Garigliotti, Darío
Telle, Jan Arne
Hernández-Orallo, José
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computation and Language
I.2.7; I.2.10
Large language models have become multimodal, and many of them are said to integrate their modalities using common representations. If this were true, a drawing of a car as an image, for instance, should map to a similar area in the latent space as a textual description of the strokes that form the drawing. To explore this in a black-box access regime to these models, we propose the use of machine teaching, a theory that studies the minimal set of examples a teacher needs to choose so that the learner captures the concept. In this paper, we evaluate the complexity of teaching vision-language models a subset of objects in the Quick, Draw! dataset using two presentations: raw images as bitmaps and trace coordinates in TikZ format. The results indicate that image-based representations generally require fewer segments and achieve higher accuracy than coordinate-based representations. But, surprisingly, the teaching size usually ranks concepts similarly across both modalities, even when controlling for (a human proxy of) concept priors, suggesting that the simplicity of concepts may be an inherent property that transcends modality representations.
title Relative Drawing Identification Complexity is Invariant to Modality in Vision-Language Models
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Computation and Language
I.2.7; I.2.10
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10583