It's only fair when I think it's fair: How Gender Bias Alignment Undermines Distributive Fairness in Human-AI Collaboration
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866910988332171264 |
|---|---|
| author | Zipperling, Domenique Deck, Luca Lanzl, Julia Kühl, Niklas |
| author_facet | Zipperling, Domenique Deck, Luca Lanzl, Julia Kühl, Niklas |
| contents | Human-AI collaboration is increasingly relevant in consequential areas where AI recommendations support human discretion. However, human-AI teams' effectiveness, capability, and fairness highly depend on human perceptions of AI. Positive fairness perceptions have been shown to foster trust and acceptance of AI recommendations. Yet, work on confirmation bias highlights that humans selectively adhere to AI recommendations that align with their expectations and beliefs -- despite not being necessarily correct or fair. This raises the question whether confirmation bias also transfers to the alignment of gender bias between human and AI decisions. In our study, we examine how gender bias alignment influences fairness perceptions and reliance. The results of a 2x2 between-subject study highlight the connection between gender bias alignment, fairness perceptions, and reliance, demonstrating that merely constructing a ``formally fair'' AI system is insufficient for optimal human-AI collaboration; ultimately, AI recommendations will likely be overridden if biases do not align. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_10661 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | It's only fair when I think it's fair: How Gender Bias Alignment Undermines Distributive Fairness in Human-AI Collaboration Zipperling, Domenique Deck, Luca Lanzl, Julia Kühl, Niklas Human-Computer Interaction Human-AI collaboration is increasingly relevant in consequential areas where AI recommendations support human discretion. However, human-AI teams' effectiveness, capability, and fairness highly depend on human perceptions of AI. Positive fairness perceptions have been shown to foster trust and acceptance of AI recommendations. Yet, work on confirmation bias highlights that humans selectively adhere to AI recommendations that align with their expectations and beliefs -- despite not being necessarily correct or fair. This raises the question whether confirmation bias also transfers to the alignment of gender bias between human and AI decisions. In our study, we examine how gender bias alignment influences fairness perceptions and reliance. The results of a 2x2 between-subject study highlight the connection between gender bias alignment, fairness perceptions, and reliance, demonstrating that merely constructing a ``formally fair'' AI system is insufficient for optimal human-AI collaboration; ultimately, AI recommendations will likely be overridden if biases do not align. |
| title | It's only fair when I think it's fair: How Gender Bias Alignment Undermines Distributive Fairness in Human-AI Collaboration |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10661 |