Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10709 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866909612113920000 |
|---|---|
| author | Stokolesov, M. S. Nurgaliev, M. R. Kharitonov, I. P. Adishchev, E. V. Sorokin, D. I. Clark, R. Orlov, D. M. |
| author_facet | Stokolesov, M. S. Nurgaliev, M. R. Kharitonov, I. P. Adishchev, E. V. Sorokin, D. I. Clark, R. Orlov, D. M. |
| contents | This study investigates the feasibility of reconstructing the last closed flux surface (LCFS) in the DIII-D tokamak using neural network models trained on reduced input feature sets, addressing an ill-posed task. Two models are compared: one trained solely on coil currents and another incorporating coil currents, plasma current, and loop voltage. The model trained exclusively on coil currents achieved a mean point displacement of 0.04 m on a held-out test set, while the inclusion of plasma current and loop voltage reduced the error to 0.03 m. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between input feature complexity and reconstruction accuracy, demonstrating the potential of machine learning algorithms to perform effectively in data-limited environments, such as those expected in Fusion Power Plants (FPP) due to diagnostic constraints imposed by the presence of blankets and shielding. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_10709 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Reconstructing the Plasma Boundary with a Reduced Set of Diagnostics Stokolesov, M. S. Nurgaliev, M. R. Kharitonov, I. P. Adishchev, E. V. Sorokin, D. I. Clark, R. Orlov, D. M. Plasma Physics This study investigates the feasibility of reconstructing the last closed flux surface (LCFS) in the DIII-D tokamak using neural network models trained on reduced input feature sets, addressing an ill-posed task. Two models are compared: one trained solely on coil currents and another incorporating coil currents, plasma current, and loop voltage. The model trained exclusively on coil currents achieved a mean point displacement of 0.04 m on a held-out test set, while the inclusion of plasma current and loop voltage reduced the error to 0.03 m. This comparison highlights the trade-offs between input feature complexity and reconstruction accuracy, demonstrating the potential of machine learning algorithms to perform effectively in data-limited environments, such as those expected in Fusion Power Plants (FPP) due to diagnostic constraints imposed by the presence of blankets and shielding. |
| title | Reconstructing the Plasma Boundary with a Reduced Set of Diagnostics |
| topic | Plasma Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10709 |