Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lepine, Brandon, Kim, Juho, Mishkin, Pamela, Beane, Matthew
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866915840607125504
author Lepine, Brandon
Kim, Juho
Mishkin, Pamela
Beane, Matthew
author_facet Lepine, Brandon
Kim, Juho
Mishkin, Pamela
Beane, Matthew
contents Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue-offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI-assisted knowledge work. We recruited 34 financial professionals to complete a complex valuation task using GPT-4o and developed a transcript-based framework estimating intrinsic and extraneous load from computational indicators anchored in a task decomposition and knowledge graph. Across 1,178 participant-subtask observations, AI-generated content usage is positively associated with quality, while extraneous load shows the largest negative association-roughly three times that of intrinsic load. Mediation reveals a compensatory pathway partially offsetting but not eliminating load-related deficits. Extraneous load persists within speakers and spills asymmetrically to model responses. Model-initiated task switching is the strongest predictor of decline. Expertise moderates these dynamics: less experienced professionals face larger penalties and derive greater marginal gains from AI-generated content, yet are not those who most increase uptake under load.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_10742
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work
Lepine, Brandon
Kim, Juho
Mishkin, Pamela
Beane, Matthew
Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
K.4.2; K.4.3
Systems like ChatGPT and Claude assist billions through proactive dialogue-offering unsolicited, task-relevant information. Drawing on Cognitive Load Theory, we study how cognitive load shapes performance in AI-assisted knowledge work. We recruited 34 financial professionals to complete a complex valuation task using GPT-4o and developed a transcript-based framework estimating intrinsic and extraneous load from computational indicators anchored in a task decomposition and knowledge graph. Across 1,178 participant-subtask observations, AI-generated content usage is positively associated with quality, while extraneous load shows the largest negative association-roughly three times that of intrinsic load. Mediation reveals a compensatory pathway partially offsetting but not eliminating load-related deficits. Extraneous load persists within speakers and spills asymmetrically to model responses. Model-initiated task switching is the strongest predictor of decline. Expertise moderates these dynamics: less experienced professionals face larger penalties and derive greater marginal gains from AI-generated content, yet are not those who most increase uptake under load.
title Precision Proactivity: Measuring Cognitive Load in Real-World AI-Assisted Work
topic Artificial Intelligence
Human-Computer Interaction
K.4.2; K.4.3
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10742