Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wu, Kevin, Wu, Eric, Thapa, Rahul, Wei, Kevin, Zhang, Angela, Suresh, Arvind, Tao, Jacqueline J., Sun, Min Woo, Lozano, Alejandro, Zou, James
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11733
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916745989586944
author Wu, Kevin
Wu, Eric
Thapa, Rahul
Wei, Kevin
Zhang, Angela
Suresh, Arvind
Tao, Jacqueline J.
Sun, Min Woo
Lozano, Alejandro
Zou, James
author_facet Wu, Kevin
Wu, Eric
Thapa, Rahul
Wei, Kevin
Zhang, Angela
Suresh, Arvind
Tao, Jacqueline J.
Sun, Min Woo
Lozano, Alejandro
Zou, James
contents Doctors and patients alike increasingly use Large Language Models (LLMs) to diagnose clinical cases. However, unlike domains such as math or coding, where correctness can be objectively defined by the final answer, medical diagnosis requires both the outcome and the reasoning process to be accurate. Currently, widely used medical benchmarks like MedQA and MMLU assess only accuracy in the final answer, overlooking the quality and faithfulness of the clinical reasoning process. To address this limitation, we introduce MedCaseReasoning, the first open-access dataset for evaluating LLMs on their ability to align with clinician-authored diagnostic reasoning. The dataset includes 14,489 diagnostic question-and-answer cases, each paired with detailed reasoning statements derived from open-access medical case reports. We evaluate state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs on MedCaseReasoning and find significant shortcomings in their diagnoses and reasoning: for instance, the top-performing open-source model, DeepSeek-R1, achieves only 48% 10-shot diagnostic accuracy and mentions only 64% of the clinician reasoning statements (recall). However, we demonstrate that fine-tuning LLMs on the reasoning traces derived from MedCaseReasoning significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and clinical reasoning recall by an average relative gain of 29% and 41%, respectively. The open-source dataset, code, and models are available at https://github.com/kevinwu23/Stanford-MedCaseReasoning.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_11733
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MedCaseReasoning: Evaluating and learning diagnostic reasoning from clinical case reports
Wu, Kevin
Wu, Eric
Thapa, Rahul
Wei, Kevin
Zhang, Angela
Suresh, Arvind
Tao, Jacqueline J.
Sun, Min Woo
Lozano, Alejandro
Zou, James
Computation and Language
Doctors and patients alike increasingly use Large Language Models (LLMs) to diagnose clinical cases. However, unlike domains such as math or coding, where correctness can be objectively defined by the final answer, medical diagnosis requires both the outcome and the reasoning process to be accurate. Currently, widely used medical benchmarks like MedQA and MMLU assess only accuracy in the final answer, overlooking the quality and faithfulness of the clinical reasoning process. To address this limitation, we introduce MedCaseReasoning, the first open-access dataset for evaluating LLMs on their ability to align with clinician-authored diagnostic reasoning. The dataset includes 14,489 diagnostic question-and-answer cases, each paired with detailed reasoning statements derived from open-access medical case reports. We evaluate state-of-the-art reasoning LLMs on MedCaseReasoning and find significant shortcomings in their diagnoses and reasoning: for instance, the top-performing open-source model, DeepSeek-R1, achieves only 48% 10-shot diagnostic accuracy and mentions only 64% of the clinician reasoning statements (recall). However, we demonstrate that fine-tuning LLMs on the reasoning traces derived from MedCaseReasoning significantly improves diagnostic accuracy and clinical reasoning recall by an average relative gain of 29% and 41%, respectively. The open-source dataset, code, and models are available at https://github.com/kevinwu23/Stanford-MedCaseReasoning.
title MedCaseReasoning: Evaluating and learning diagnostic reasoning from clinical case reports
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11733