Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Freyaldenhoven, Simon, Hansen, Christian
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912381003628544
author Freyaldenhoven, Simon
Hansen, Christian
author_facet Freyaldenhoven, Simon
Hansen, Christian
contents We consider point estimation and inference for the treatment effect path of a policy. Examples include dynamic treatment effects in microeconomics, impulse response functions in macroeconomics, and event study paths in finance. We present two sets of plausible bounds to quantify and visualize the uncertainty associated with this object. Both plausible bounds are often substantially tighter than traditional confidence intervals, and can provide useful insights even when traditional (uniform) confidence bands appear uninformative. Our bounds can also lead to markedly different conclusions when there is significant correlation in the estimates, reflecting the fact that traditional confidence bands can be ineffective at visualizing the impact of such correlation. Our first set of bounds covers the average (or overall) effect rather than the entire treatment path. Our second set of bounds imposes data-driven smoothness restrictions on the treatment path. Post-selection Inference (Berk et al. [2013]) provides formal coverage guarantees for these bounds. The chosen restrictions also imply novel point estimates that perform well across our simulations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_12014
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle (Visualizing) Plausible Treatment Effect Paths
Freyaldenhoven, Simon
Hansen, Christian
Econometrics
Methodology
We consider point estimation and inference for the treatment effect path of a policy. Examples include dynamic treatment effects in microeconomics, impulse response functions in macroeconomics, and event study paths in finance. We present two sets of plausible bounds to quantify and visualize the uncertainty associated with this object. Both plausible bounds are often substantially tighter than traditional confidence intervals, and can provide useful insights even when traditional (uniform) confidence bands appear uninformative. Our bounds can also lead to markedly different conclusions when there is significant correlation in the estimates, reflecting the fact that traditional confidence bands can be ineffective at visualizing the impact of such correlation. Our first set of bounds covers the average (or overall) effect rather than the entire treatment path. Our second set of bounds imposes data-driven smoothness restrictions on the treatment path. Post-selection Inference (Berk et al. [2013]) provides formal coverage guarantees for these bounds. The chosen restrictions also imply novel point estimates that perform well across our simulations.
title (Visualizing) Plausible Treatment Effect Paths
topic Econometrics
Methodology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12014