A Paradigm for Creative Ownership
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909782824189952 |
|---|---|
| author | Polimetla, Tejaswi Gero, Katy Ilonka Glassman, Elena Leah |
| author_facet | Polimetla, Tejaswi Gero, Katy Ilonka Glassman, Elena Leah |
| contents | As generative AI tools become embedded in creative practice, questions of ownership in co-creative contexts are pressing. Yet studies of human-AI collaboration often invoke "ownership" without definition: sometimes conflating it with other concepts, and other times leaving interpretation to participants. This inconsistency makes findings difficult to compare across or even within studies. We introduce a framework of creative ownership comprising three dimensions - Person, Process, and System - each with three subdimensions, offering a shared language for both system design and HCI research. In semi-structured interviews with 21 creative professionals, we found that participants' initial references to ownership (e.g., embodiment, control, concept) were fully encompassed by the framework, demonstrating its coverage. Once introduced, however, they also articulated and prioritized the remaining subdimensions, underscoring how the framework expands reflection and enables richer insights. Our contributions include 1) the framework, 2) a web-based visualization tool, and 3) empirical findings on its utility. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_15971 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Paradigm for Creative Ownership Polimetla, Tejaswi Gero, Katy Ilonka Glassman, Elena Leah Human-Computer Interaction As generative AI tools become embedded in creative practice, questions of ownership in co-creative contexts are pressing. Yet studies of human-AI collaboration often invoke "ownership" without definition: sometimes conflating it with other concepts, and other times leaving interpretation to participants. This inconsistency makes findings difficult to compare across or even within studies. We introduce a framework of creative ownership comprising three dimensions - Person, Process, and System - each with three subdimensions, offering a shared language for both system design and HCI research. In semi-structured interviews with 21 creative professionals, we found that participants' initial references to ownership (e.g., embodiment, control, concept) were fully encompassed by the framework, demonstrating its coverage. Once introduced, however, they also articulated and prioritized the remaining subdimensions, underscoring how the framework expands reflection and enables richer insights. Our contributions include 1) the framework, 2) a web-based visualization tool, and 3) empirical findings on its utility. |
| title | A Paradigm for Creative Ownership |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15971 |