Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maiya, Anirudh, Alghamdi, Razan, Pacheco, Maria Leonor, Trivedi, Ashutosh, Somenzi, Fabio
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15993
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866918466904129536
author Maiya, Anirudh
Alghamdi, Razan
Pacheco, Maria Leonor
Trivedi, Ashutosh
Somenzi, Fabio
author_facet Maiya, Anirudh
Alghamdi, Razan
Pacheco, Maria Leonor
Trivedi, Ashutosh
Somenzi, Fabio
contents The success of Large Language Models (LLMs) in human-AI collaborative decision-making hinges on their ability to provide trustworthy, gradual, and tailored explanations. Solving complex puzzles, such as Sudoku, offers a canonical example of this collaboration, where clear and customized explanations often hold greater importance than the final solution. In this study, we evaluate the performance of five LLMs in solving and explaining \sixsix{} Sudoku puzzles. While one LLM demonstrates limited success in solving puzzles, none can explain the solution process in a manner that reflects strategic reasoning or intuitive problem-solving. These findings underscore significant challenges that must be addressed before LLMs can become effective partners in human-AI collaborative decision-making.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_15993
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Explaining Puzzle Solutions in Natural Language: An Exploratory Study on 6x6 Sudoku
Maiya, Anirudh
Alghamdi, Razan
Pacheco, Maria Leonor
Trivedi, Ashutosh
Somenzi, Fabio
Computation and Language
The success of Large Language Models (LLMs) in human-AI collaborative decision-making hinges on their ability to provide trustworthy, gradual, and tailored explanations. Solving complex puzzles, such as Sudoku, offers a canonical example of this collaboration, where clear and customized explanations often hold greater importance than the final solution. In this study, we evaluate the performance of five LLMs in solving and explaining \sixsix{} Sudoku puzzles. While one LLM demonstrates limited success in solving puzzles, none can explain the solution process in a manner that reflects strategic reasoning or intuitive problem-solving. These findings underscore significant challenges that must be addressed before LLMs can become effective partners in human-AI collaborative decision-making.
title Explaining Puzzle Solutions in Natural Language: An Exploratory Study on 6x6 Sudoku
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15993