What You Read Isn't What You Hear: Linguistic Sensitivity in Deepfake Speech Detection

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nguyen, Binh, Shi, Shuji, Ofman, Ryan, Le, Thai
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915300637671424
author Nguyen, Binh
Shi, Shuji
Ofman, Ryan
Le, Thai
author_facet Nguyen, Binh
Shi, Shuji
Ofman, Ryan
Le, Thai
contents Recent advances in text-to-speech technologies have enabled realistic voice generation, fueling audio-based deepfake attacks such as fraud and impersonation. While audio anti-spoofing systems are critical for detecting such threats, prior work has predominantly focused on acoustic-level perturbations, leaving the impact of linguistic variation largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate the linguistic sensitivity of both open-source and commercial anti-spoofing detectors by introducing transcript-level adversarial attacks. Our extensive evaluation reveals that even minor linguistic perturbations can significantly degrade detection accuracy: attack success rates surpass 60% on several open-source detector-voice pairs, and notably one commercial detection accuracy drops from 100% on synthetic audio to just 32%. Through a comprehensive feature attribution analysis, we identify that both linguistic complexity and model-level audio embedding similarity contribute strongly to detector vulnerability. We further demonstrate the real-world risk via a case study replicating the Brad Pitt audio deepfake scam, using transcript adversarial attacks to completely bypass commercial detectors. These results highlight the need to move beyond purely acoustic defenses and account for linguistic variation in the design of robust anti-spoofing systems. All source code will be publicly available.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_17513
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle What You Read Isn't What You Hear: Linguistic Sensitivity in Deepfake Speech Detection
Nguyen, Binh
Shi, Shuji
Ofman, Ryan
Le, Thai
Machine Learning
Computation and Language
Sound
Audio and Speech Processing
53-04
Recent advances in text-to-speech technologies have enabled realistic voice generation, fueling audio-based deepfake attacks such as fraud and impersonation. While audio anti-spoofing systems are critical for detecting such threats, prior work has predominantly focused on acoustic-level perturbations, leaving the impact of linguistic variation largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate the linguistic sensitivity of both open-source and commercial anti-spoofing detectors by introducing transcript-level adversarial attacks. Our extensive evaluation reveals that even minor linguistic perturbations can significantly degrade detection accuracy: attack success rates surpass 60% on several open-source detector-voice pairs, and notably one commercial detection accuracy drops from 100% on synthetic audio to just 32%. Through a comprehensive feature attribution analysis, we identify that both linguistic complexity and model-level audio embedding similarity contribute strongly to detector vulnerability. We further demonstrate the real-world risk via a case study replicating the Brad Pitt audio deepfake scam, using transcript adversarial attacks to completely bypass commercial detectors. These results highlight the need to move beyond purely acoustic defenses and account for linguistic variation in the design of robust anti-spoofing systems. All source code will be publicly available.
title What You Read Isn't What You Hear: Linguistic Sensitivity in Deepfake Speech Detection
topic Machine Learning
Computation and Language
Sound
Audio and Speech Processing
53-04
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.17513