Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Zheng, Xu, Liao, Chenfei, Fu, Yuqian, Lei, Kaiyu, Lyu, Yuanhuiyi, Jiang, Lutao, Ren, Bin, Chen, Jialei, Wang, Jiawen, Li, Chengxin, Zhang, Linfeng, Paudel, Danda Pani, Huang, Xuanjing, Jiang, Yu-Gang, Sebe, Nicu, Tao, Dacheng, Van Gool, Luc, Hu, Xuming
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18657
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866908378695991296
author Zheng, Xu
Liao, Chenfei
Fu, Yuqian
Lei, Kaiyu
Lyu, Yuanhuiyi
Jiang, Lutao
Ren, Bin
Chen, Jialei
Wang, Jiawen
Li, Chengxin
Zhang, Linfeng
Paudel, Danda Pani
Huang, Xuanjing
Jiang, Yu-Gang
Sebe, Nicu
Tao, Dacheng
Van Gool, Luc
Hu, Xuming
author_facet Zheng, Xu
Liao, Chenfei
Fu, Yuqian
Lei, Kaiyu
Lyu, Yuanhuiyi
Jiang, Lutao
Ren, Bin
Chen, Jialei
Wang, Jiawen
Li, Chengxin
Zhang, Linfeng
Paudel, Danda Pani
Huang, Xuanjing
Jiang, Yu-Gang
Sebe, Nicu
Tao, Dacheng
Van Gool, Luc
Hu, Xuming
contents Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising results in integrating diverse modalities such as texts and images. MLLMs are heavily influenced by modality bias, often relying on language while under-utilizing other modalities like visual inputs. This position paper argues that MLLMs are deeply affected by modality bias. Firstly, we diagnose the current state of modality bias, highlighting its manifestations across various tasks. Secondly, we propose a systematic research road-map related to modality bias in MLLMs. Thirdly, we identify key factors of modality bias in MLLMs and offer actionable suggestions for future research to mitigate it. To substantiate these findings, we conduct experiments that demonstrate the influence of each factor: 1. Data Characteristics: Language data is compact and abstract, while visual data is redundant and complex, creating an inherent imbalance in learning dynamics. 2. Imbalanced Backbone Capabilities: The dominance of pretrained language models in MLLMs leads to overreliance on language and neglect of visual information. 3. Training Objectives: Current objectives often fail to promote balanced cross-modal alignment, resulting in shortcut learning biased toward language. These findings highlight the need for balanced training strategies and model architectures to better integrate multiple modalities in MLLMs. We call for interdisciplinary efforts to tackle these challenges and drive innovation in MLLM research. Our work provides a fresh perspective on modality bias in MLLMs and offers insights for developing more robust and generalizable multimodal systems-advancing progress toward Artificial General Intelligence.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_18657
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias
Zheng, Xu
Liao, Chenfei
Fu, Yuqian
Lei, Kaiyu
Lyu, Yuanhuiyi
Jiang, Lutao
Ren, Bin
Chen, Jialei
Wang, Jiawen
Li, Chengxin
Zhang, Linfeng
Paudel, Danda Pani
Huang, Xuanjing
Jiang, Yu-Gang
Sebe, Nicu
Tao, Dacheng
Van Gool, Luc
Hu, Xuming
Artificial Intelligence
Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising results in integrating diverse modalities such as texts and images. MLLMs are heavily influenced by modality bias, often relying on language while under-utilizing other modalities like visual inputs. This position paper argues that MLLMs are deeply affected by modality bias. Firstly, we diagnose the current state of modality bias, highlighting its manifestations across various tasks. Secondly, we propose a systematic research road-map related to modality bias in MLLMs. Thirdly, we identify key factors of modality bias in MLLMs and offer actionable suggestions for future research to mitigate it. To substantiate these findings, we conduct experiments that demonstrate the influence of each factor: 1. Data Characteristics: Language data is compact and abstract, while visual data is redundant and complex, creating an inherent imbalance in learning dynamics. 2. Imbalanced Backbone Capabilities: The dominance of pretrained language models in MLLMs leads to overreliance on language and neglect of visual information. 3. Training Objectives: Current objectives often fail to promote balanced cross-modal alignment, resulting in shortcut learning biased toward language. These findings highlight the need for balanced training strategies and model architectures to better integrate multiple modalities in MLLMs. We call for interdisciplinary efforts to tackle these challenges and drive innovation in MLLM research. Our work provides a fresh perspective on modality bias in MLLMs and offers insights for developing more robust and generalizable multimodal systems-advancing progress toward Artificial General Intelligence.
title MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18657