Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wu, Yuchen, Sun, Edward, Zhu, Kaijie, Lian, Jianxun, Hernandez-Orallo, Jose, Caliskan, Aylin, Wang, Jindong
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18882
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908760781357056
author Wu, Yuchen
Sun, Edward
Zhu, Kaijie
Lian, Jianxun
Hernandez-Orallo, Jose
Caliskan, Aylin
Wang, Jindong
author_facet Wu, Yuchen
Sun, Edward
Zhu, Kaijie
Lian, Jianxun
Hernandez-Orallo, Jose
Caliskan, Aylin
Wang, Jindong
contents Large language models (LLMs) typically generate identical or similar responses for all users given the same prompt, posing serious safety risks in high-stakes applications where user vulnerabilities differ widely. Existing safety evaluations primarily rely on context-independent metrics - such as factuality, bias, or toxicity - overlooking the fact that the same response may carry divergent risks depending on the user's background or condition. We introduce personalized safety to fill this gap and present PENGUIN - a benchmark comprising 14,000 scenarios across seven sensitive domains with both context-rich and context-free variants. Evaluating six leading LLMs, we demonstrate that personalized user information significantly improves safety scores by 43.2%, confirming the effectiveness of personalization in safety alignment. However, not all context attributes contribute equally to safety enhancement. To address this, we develop RAISE - a training-free, two-stage agent framework that strategically acquires user-specific background. RAISE improves safety scores by up to 31.6% over six vanilla LLMs, while maintaining a low interaction cost of just 2.7 user queries on average. Our findings highlight the importance of selective information gathering in safety-critical domains and offer a practical solution for personalizing LLM responses without model retraining. This work establishes a foundation for safety research that adapts to individual user contexts rather than assuming a universal harm standard.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_18882
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Personalized Safety in LLMs: A Benchmark and A Planning-Based Agent Approach
Wu, Yuchen
Sun, Edward
Zhu, Kaijie
Lian, Jianxun
Hernandez-Orallo, Jose
Caliskan, Aylin
Wang, Jindong
Computers and Society
Large language models (LLMs) typically generate identical or similar responses for all users given the same prompt, posing serious safety risks in high-stakes applications where user vulnerabilities differ widely. Existing safety evaluations primarily rely on context-independent metrics - such as factuality, bias, or toxicity - overlooking the fact that the same response may carry divergent risks depending on the user's background or condition. We introduce personalized safety to fill this gap and present PENGUIN - a benchmark comprising 14,000 scenarios across seven sensitive domains with both context-rich and context-free variants. Evaluating six leading LLMs, we demonstrate that personalized user information significantly improves safety scores by 43.2%, confirming the effectiveness of personalization in safety alignment. However, not all context attributes contribute equally to safety enhancement. To address this, we develop RAISE - a training-free, two-stage agent framework that strategically acquires user-specific background. RAISE improves safety scores by up to 31.6% over six vanilla LLMs, while maintaining a low interaction cost of just 2.7 user queries on average. Our findings highlight the importance of selective information gathering in safety-critical domains and offer a practical solution for personalizing LLM responses without model retraining. This work establishes a foundation for safety research that adapts to individual user contexts rather than assuming a universal harm standard.
title Personalized Safety in LLMs: A Benchmark and A Planning-Based Agent Approach
topic Computers and Society
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18882