Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Domain-specific Data Selection: A Case Study on Medical Instruction-tuning

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhong, Qihuang, Ding, Liang, Liao, Fei, Liu, Juhua, Du, Bo, Tao, Dacheng
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913863350353920
author Zhong, Qihuang
Ding, Liang
Liao, Fei
Liu, Juhua
Du, Bo
Tao, Dacheng
author_facet Zhong, Qihuang
Ding, Liang
Liao, Fei
Liu, Juhua
Du, Bo
Tao, Dacheng
contents Domain-specific instruction-tuning has become the defacto standard for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) in specialized applications, e.g., medical question answering. Since the instruction-tuning dataset might contain redundant or low-quality data, data selection (DS) is usually required to maximize the data efficiency. Despite the successes in the general domain, current DS methods often struggle to select the desired data for domain-specific instruction-tuning. One of the main reasons is that they neglect the impact of knowledge conflicts, i.e., the discrepancy between LLMs' pretrained knowledge and context knowledge of instruction data, which could damage LLMs' prior abilities and lead to hallucination. To this end, we propose a simple-yet-effective Knowledge-aware Data Selection (namely KDS) framework to select the domain-specific instruction-tuning data that meets LLMs' actual needs. The core of KDS is to leverage two knowledge-aware metrics for quantitatively measuring knowledge conflicts from two aspects: context-memory knowledge alignment and intra-memory knowledge consistency. By filtering the data with large knowledge conflicts and sampling the high-quality and diverse data, KDS can effectively stimulate the LLMs' abilities and achieve better domain-specific performance. Taking the medical domain as the testbed, we conduct extensive experiments and empirically prove that KDS surpasses the other baselines and brings significant and consistent performance gains among all LLMs. More encouragingly, KDS effectively improves the model generalization and alleviates the hallucination problem.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_21958
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Domain-specific Data Selection: A Case Study on Medical Instruction-tuning
Zhong, Qihuang
Ding, Liang
Liao, Fei
Liu, Juhua
Du, Bo
Tao, Dacheng
Computation and Language
Domain-specific instruction-tuning has become the defacto standard for improving the performance of large language models (LLMs) in specialized applications, e.g., medical question answering. Since the instruction-tuning dataset might contain redundant or low-quality data, data selection (DS) is usually required to maximize the data efficiency. Despite the successes in the general domain, current DS methods often struggle to select the desired data for domain-specific instruction-tuning. One of the main reasons is that they neglect the impact of knowledge conflicts, i.e., the discrepancy between LLMs' pretrained knowledge and context knowledge of instruction data, which could damage LLMs' prior abilities and lead to hallucination. To this end, we propose a simple-yet-effective Knowledge-aware Data Selection (namely KDS) framework to select the domain-specific instruction-tuning data that meets LLMs' actual needs. The core of KDS is to leverage two knowledge-aware metrics for quantitatively measuring knowledge conflicts from two aspects: context-memory knowledge alignment and intra-memory knowledge consistency. By filtering the data with large knowledge conflicts and sampling the high-quality and diverse data, KDS can effectively stimulate the LLMs' abilities and achieve better domain-specific performance. Taking the medical domain as the testbed, we conduct extensive experiments and empirically prove that KDS surpasses the other baselines and brings significant and consistent performance gains among all LLMs. More encouragingly, KDS effectively improves the model generalization and alleviates the hallucination problem.
title Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Domain-specific Data Selection: A Case Study on Medical Instruction-tuning
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21958