Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Defrance, MaryBeth, Bied, Guillaume, Buyl, Maarten, Lijffijt, Jefrey, De Bie, Tijl
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22114
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916764020899840
author Defrance, MaryBeth
Bied, Guillaume
Buyl, Maarten
Lijffijt, Jefrey
De Bie, Tijl
author_facet Defrance, MaryBeth
Bied, Guillaume
Buyl, Maarten
Lijffijt, Jefrey
De Bie, Tijl
contents Over the past 15 years, hundreds of bias mitigation methods have been proposed in the pursuit of fairness in machine learning (ML). However, algorithmic biases are domain-, task-, and model-specific, leading to a `portability trap': bias mitigation solutions in one context may not be appropriate in another. Thus, a myriad of design choices have to be made when creating a bias mitigation method, such as the formalization of fairness it pursues, and where and how it intervenes in the ML pipeline. This creates challenges in benchmarking and comparing the relative merits of different bias mitigation methods, and limits their uptake by practitioners. We propose BiMi Sheets as a portable, uniform guide to document the design choices of any bias mitigation method. This enables researchers and practitioners to quickly learn its main characteristics and to compare with their desiderata. Furthermore, the sheets' structure allow for the creation of a structured database of bias mitigation methods. In order to foster the sheets' adoption, we provide a platform for finding and creating BiMi Sheets at bimisheet.com.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_22114
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle BiMi Sheets: Infosheets for bias mitigation methods
Defrance, MaryBeth
Bied, Guillaume
Buyl, Maarten
Lijffijt, Jefrey
De Bie, Tijl
Machine Learning
Over the past 15 years, hundreds of bias mitigation methods have been proposed in the pursuit of fairness in machine learning (ML). However, algorithmic biases are domain-, task-, and model-specific, leading to a `portability trap': bias mitigation solutions in one context may not be appropriate in another. Thus, a myriad of design choices have to be made when creating a bias mitigation method, such as the formalization of fairness it pursues, and where and how it intervenes in the ML pipeline. This creates challenges in benchmarking and comparing the relative merits of different bias mitigation methods, and limits their uptake by practitioners. We propose BiMi Sheets as a portable, uniform guide to document the design choices of any bias mitigation method. This enables researchers and practitioners to quickly learn its main characteristics and to compare with their desiderata. Furthermore, the sheets' structure allow for the creation of a structured database of bias mitigation methods. In order to foster the sheets' adoption, we provide a platform for finding and creating BiMi Sheets at bimisheet.com.
title BiMi Sheets: Infosheets for bias mitigation methods
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22114