Adaptive tail index estimation: minimal assumptions and non-asymptotic guarantees

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lederer, Johannes, Sabourin, Anne, Taheri, Mahsa
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915312374382592
author Lederer, Johannes
Sabourin, Anne
Taheri, Mahsa
author_facet Lederer, Johannes
Sabourin, Anne
Taheri, Mahsa
contents A notoriously difficult challenge in extreme value theory is the choice of the number $k\ll n$, where $n$ is the total sample size, of extreme data points to consider for inference of tail quantities. Existing theoretical guarantees for adaptive methods typically require second-order assumptions or von Mises assumptions that are difficult to verify and often come with tuning parameters that are challenging to calibrate. This paper revisits the problem of adaptive selection of $k$ for the Hill estimator. Our goal is not an `optimal' $k$ but one that is `good enough', in the sense that we strive for non-asymptotic guarantees that might be sub-optimal but are explicit and require minimal conditions. We propose a transparent adaptive rule that does not require preliminary calibration of constants, inspired by `adaptive validation' developed in high-dimensional statistics. A key feature of our approach is the consideration of a grid for $k$ of size $ \ll n $, which aligns with common practice among practitioners but has remained unexplored in theoretical analysis. Our rule only involves an explicit expression of a variance-type term; in particular, it does not require controlling or estimating a biasterm. Our theoretical analysis is valid for all heavy-tailed distributions, specifically for all regularly varying survival functions. Furthermore, when von Mises conditions hold, our method achieves `almost' minimax optimality with a rate of $\sqrt{\log \log n}~ n^{-|ρ|/(1+2|ρ|)}$ when the grid size is of order $\log n$, in contrast to the $ (\log \log (n)/n)^{|ρ|/(1+2|ρ|)} $ rate in existing work. Our simulations show that our approach performs particularly well for ill-behaved distributions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_22371
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Adaptive tail index estimation: minimal assumptions and non-asymptotic guarantees
Lederer, Johannes
Sabourin, Anne
Taheri, Mahsa
Other Statistics
Statistics Theory
A notoriously difficult challenge in extreme value theory is the choice of the number $k\ll n$, where $n$ is the total sample size, of extreme data points to consider for inference of tail quantities. Existing theoretical guarantees for adaptive methods typically require second-order assumptions or von Mises assumptions that are difficult to verify and often come with tuning parameters that are challenging to calibrate. This paper revisits the problem of adaptive selection of $k$ for the Hill estimator. Our goal is not an `optimal' $k$ but one that is `good enough', in the sense that we strive for non-asymptotic guarantees that might be sub-optimal but are explicit and require minimal conditions. We propose a transparent adaptive rule that does not require preliminary calibration of constants, inspired by `adaptive validation' developed in high-dimensional statistics. A key feature of our approach is the consideration of a grid for $k$ of size $ \ll n $, which aligns with common practice among practitioners but has remained unexplored in theoretical analysis. Our rule only involves an explicit expression of a variance-type term; in particular, it does not require controlling or estimating a biasterm. Our theoretical analysis is valid for all heavy-tailed distributions, specifically for all regularly varying survival functions. Furthermore, when von Mises conditions hold, our method achieves `almost' minimax optimality with a rate of $\sqrt{\log \log n}~ n^{-|ρ|/(1+2|ρ|)}$ when the grid size is of order $\log n$, in contrast to the $ (\log \log (n)/n)^{|ρ|/(1+2|ρ|)} $ rate in existing work. Our simulations show that our approach performs particularly well for ill-behaved distributions.
title Adaptive tail index estimation: minimal assumptions and non-asymptotic guarantees
topic Other Statistics
Statistics Theory
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22371