Evaluating Query Efficiency and Accuracy of Transfer Learning-based Model Extraction Attack in Federated Learning
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866915313014013952 |
|---|---|
| author | Ahamed, Sayyed Farid Roy, Sandip Banerjee, Soumya Vucovich, Marc Choi, Kevin Rahman, Abdul Hu, Alison Bowen, Edward Shetty, Sachin |
| author_facet | Ahamed, Sayyed Farid Roy, Sandip Banerjee, Soumya Vucovich, Marc Choi, Kevin Rahman, Abdul Hu, Alison Bowen, Edward Shetty, Sachin |
| contents | Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative learning framework designed to protect client data, yet it remains highly vulnerable to Intellectual Property (IP) threats. Model extraction (ME) attacks pose a significant risk to Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) platforms, enabling attackers to replicate confidential models by querying black-box (without internal insight) APIs. Despite FL's privacy-preserving goals, its distributed nature makes it particularly susceptible to such attacks. This paper examines the vulnerability of FL-based victim models to two types of model extraction attacks. For various federated clients built under the NVFlare platform, we implemented ME attacks across two deep learning architectures and three image datasets. We evaluate the proposed ME attack performance using various metrics, including accuracy, fidelity, and KL divergence. The experiments show that for different FL clients, the accuracy and fidelity of the extracted model are closely related to the size of the attack query set. Additionally, we explore a transfer learning based approach where pretrained models serve as the starting point for the extraction process. The results indicate that the accuracy and fidelity of the fine-tuned pretrained extraction models are notably higher, particularly with smaller query sets, highlighting potential advantages for attackers. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_23791 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating Query Efficiency and Accuracy of Transfer Learning-based Model Extraction Attack in Federated Learning Ahamed, Sayyed Farid Roy, Sandip Banerjee, Soumya Vucovich, Marc Choi, Kevin Rahman, Abdul Hu, Alison Bowen, Edward Shetty, Sachin Cryptography and Security Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning I.2.6; D.4.6 Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative learning framework designed to protect client data, yet it remains highly vulnerable to Intellectual Property (IP) threats. Model extraction (ME) attacks pose a significant risk to Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) platforms, enabling attackers to replicate confidential models by querying black-box (without internal insight) APIs. Despite FL's privacy-preserving goals, its distributed nature makes it particularly susceptible to such attacks. This paper examines the vulnerability of FL-based victim models to two types of model extraction attacks. For various federated clients built under the NVFlare platform, we implemented ME attacks across two deep learning architectures and three image datasets. We evaluate the proposed ME attack performance using various metrics, including accuracy, fidelity, and KL divergence. The experiments show that for different FL clients, the accuracy and fidelity of the extracted model are closely related to the size of the attack query set. Additionally, we explore a transfer learning based approach where pretrained models serve as the starting point for the extraction process. The results indicate that the accuracy and fidelity of the fine-tuned pretrained extraction models are notably higher, particularly with smaller query sets, highlighting potential advantages for attackers. |
| title | Evaluating Query Efficiency and Accuracy of Transfer Learning-based Model Extraction Attack in Federated Learning |
| topic | Cryptography and Security Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning I.2.6; D.4.6 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23791 |