Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheung, Jerry Junyang, Shen, Shiyao, Zhuang, Yuchen, Li, Yinghao, Ramprasad, Rampi, Zhang, Chao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23982
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915313089511424
author Cheung, Jerry Junyang
Shen, Shiyao
Zhuang, Yuchen
Li, Yinghao
Ramprasad, Rampi
Zhang, Chao
author_facet Cheung, Jerry Junyang
Shen, Shiyao
Zhuang, Yuchen
Li, Yinghao
Ramprasad, Rampi
Zhang, Chao
contents Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for materials science, there is a lack of benchmarks for evaluating their domain-specific knowledge and complex reasoning abilities. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSQA, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark of 1,757 graduate-level materials science questions in two formats: detailed explanatory responses and binary True/False assessments. MSQA distinctively challenges LLMs by requiring both precise factual knowledge and multi-step reasoning across seven materials science sub-fields, such as structure-property relationships, synthesis processes, and computational modeling. Through experiments with 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, we identify significant gaps in current LLM performance. While API-based proprietary LLMs achieve up to 84.5% accuracy, open-source (OSS) LLMs peak around 60.5%, and domain-specific LLMs often underperform significantly due to overfitting and distributional shifts. MSQA represents the first benchmark to jointly evaluate the factual and reasoning capabilities of LLMs crucial for LLMs in advanced materials science.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_23982
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle MSQA: Benchmarking LLMs on Graduate-Level Materials Science Reasoning and Knowledge
Cheung, Jerry Junyang
Shen, Shiyao
Zhuang, Yuchen
Li, Yinghao
Ramprasad, Rampi
Zhang, Chao
Artificial Intelligence
Despite recent advances in large language models (LLMs) for materials science, there is a lack of benchmarks for evaluating their domain-specific knowledge and complex reasoning abilities. To bridge this gap, we introduce MSQA, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark of 1,757 graduate-level materials science questions in two formats: detailed explanatory responses and binary True/False assessments. MSQA distinctively challenges LLMs by requiring both precise factual knowledge and multi-step reasoning across seven materials science sub-fields, such as structure-property relationships, synthesis processes, and computational modeling. Through experiments with 10 state-of-the-art LLMs, we identify significant gaps in current LLM performance. While API-based proprietary LLMs achieve up to 84.5% accuracy, open-source (OSS) LLMs peak around 60.5%, and domain-specific LLMs often underperform significantly due to overfitting and distributional shifts. MSQA represents the first benchmark to jointly evaluate the factual and reasoning capabilities of LLMs crucial for LLMs in advanced materials science.
title MSQA: Benchmarking LLMs on Graduate-Level Materials Science Reasoning and Knowledge
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23982