Winners vs. Losers: Momentum-based Strategies with Intertemporal Choice for ESG Portfolios
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866908385159413760 |
|---|---|
| author | Jha, Ayush Shirvani, Abootaleb Jaffri, Ali Rachev, Svetlozar T. Fabozzi, Frank J. |
| author_facet | Jha, Ayush Shirvani, Abootaleb Jaffri, Ali Rachev, Svetlozar T. Fabozzi, Frank J. |
| contents | This paper introduces a state-dependent momentum framework that integrates ESG regime switching with tail-risk-aware reward-risk metrics. Using a dynamic programming approach and solving a finite-horizon Bellman equation, we construct long-short momentum portfolios that adjust to changing ESG sentiment regimes. Unlike traditional momentum strategies based on historical returns, our approach incorporates the Stable Tail Adjusted Return ratio and Rachev ratio to better capture downside risk in turbulent markets. We apply this framework across three asset classes, Russell 3000 equities, Dow Jones~30 stocks, and cryptocurrencies, under both pro- and anti-ESG market regimes. We find that ESG-loser portfolios significantly outperform ESG-winner portfolios in pro-ESG regimes, a counterintuitive result suggesting that market overreaction to ESG sentiment creates short-term pricing inefficiencies. This pattern is robust across tail-sensitive performance metrics and is most pronounced under a two-week formation and holding period. Our framework highlights how ESG considerations and sentiment regimes alter return dynamics, offering practical guidance for investors seeking to implement responsive momentum strategies under sustainability constraints. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about ESG investing and underscore the importance of dynamic, regime-aware portfolio construction in environments shaped by regulatory signals, investor flows, and behavioral biases. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2505_24250 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Winners vs. Losers: Momentum-based Strategies with Intertemporal Choice for ESG Portfolios Jha, Ayush Shirvani, Abootaleb Jaffri, Ali Rachev, Svetlozar T. Fabozzi, Frank J. General Economics Economics This paper introduces a state-dependent momentum framework that integrates ESG regime switching with tail-risk-aware reward-risk metrics. Using a dynamic programming approach and solving a finite-horizon Bellman equation, we construct long-short momentum portfolios that adjust to changing ESG sentiment regimes. Unlike traditional momentum strategies based on historical returns, our approach incorporates the Stable Tail Adjusted Return ratio and Rachev ratio to better capture downside risk in turbulent markets. We apply this framework across three asset classes, Russell 3000 equities, Dow Jones~30 stocks, and cryptocurrencies, under both pro- and anti-ESG market regimes. We find that ESG-loser portfolios significantly outperform ESG-winner portfolios in pro-ESG regimes, a counterintuitive result suggesting that market overreaction to ESG sentiment creates short-term pricing inefficiencies. This pattern is robust across tail-sensitive performance metrics and is most pronounced under a two-week formation and holding period. Our framework highlights how ESG considerations and sentiment regimes alter return dynamics, offering practical guidance for investors seeking to implement responsive momentum strategies under sustainability constraints. These findings challenge conventional assumptions about ESG investing and underscore the importance of dynamic, regime-aware portfolio construction in environments shaped by regulatory signals, investor flows, and behavioral biases. |
| title | Winners vs. Losers: Momentum-based Strategies with Intertemporal Choice for ESG Portfolios |
| topic | General Economics Economics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.24250 |