Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of False Positives in Algorithmic Travel Surveillance
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866915315564150784 |
|---|---|
| author | Wernick, Alina Medlar, Alan Söderholm, Sofia Głowacka, Dorota |
| author_facet | Wernick, Alina Medlar, Alan Söderholm, Sofia Głowacka, Dorota |
| contents | International air travel is highly surveilled. While surveillance is deemed necessary for law enforcement to prevent and detect terrorism and other serious crimes, even the most accurate algorithmic mass surveillance systems produce high numbers of false positives. Despite the potential impact of false positives on the fundamental rights of millions of passengers, algorithmic travel surveillance is lawful in the EU. However, as the system's processing practices and accuracy are kept secret by law, it is unknown to what degree passengers are accepting of the system's interference with their rights to privacy and data protection.
We conducted a nationally representative survey of the adult population of Finland (N=1550) to assess their attitudes towards algorithmic mass surveillance in air travel and its potential expansion to other travel contexts. Furthermore, we developed a novel approach for estimating the threshold, beyond which, the number of false positives breaches individuals' perception of contextual integrity. Surprisingly, when faced with a trade-off between privacy and security, even very high false positive counts were perceived as legitimate. This result could be attributed to Finland's high-trust cultural context, but also raises questions about people's capacity to account for privacy harms that happen to other people. We conclude by discussing how legal and ethical approaches to legitimising algorithmic surveillance based on individual rights may overlook the statistical or systemic properties of mass surveillance. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_00218 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of False Positives in Algorithmic Travel Surveillance Wernick, Alina Medlar, Alan Söderholm, Sofia Głowacka, Dorota Computers and Society International air travel is highly surveilled. While surveillance is deemed necessary for law enforcement to prevent and detect terrorism and other serious crimes, even the most accurate algorithmic mass surveillance systems produce high numbers of false positives. Despite the potential impact of false positives on the fundamental rights of millions of passengers, algorithmic travel surveillance is lawful in the EU. However, as the system's processing practices and accuracy are kept secret by law, it is unknown to what degree passengers are accepting of the system's interference with their rights to privacy and data protection. We conducted a nationally representative survey of the adult population of Finland (N=1550) to assess their attitudes towards algorithmic mass surveillance in air travel and its potential expansion to other travel contexts. Furthermore, we developed a novel approach for estimating the threshold, beyond which, the number of false positives breaches individuals' perception of contextual integrity. Surprisingly, when faced with a trade-off between privacy and security, even very high false positive counts were perceived as legitimate. This result could be attributed to Finland's high-trust cultural context, but also raises questions about people's capacity to account for privacy harms that happen to other people. We conclude by discussing how legal and ethical approaches to legitimising algorithmic surveillance based on individual rights may overlook the statistical or systemic properties of mass surveillance. |
| title | Evaluating the Contextual Integrity of False Positives in Algorithmic Travel Surveillance |
| topic | Computers and Society |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00218 |