Hidden in Plain Sight: Reasoning in Underspecified and Misspecified Scenarios for Multimodal LLMs

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Yan, Qianqi, Li, Hongquan, Jiang, Shan, Zhao, Yang, Guan, Xinze, Kuo, Ching-Chen, Wang, Xin Eric
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866912550999818240
author Yan, Qianqi
Li, Hongquan
Jiang, Shan
Zhao, Yang
Guan, Xinze
Kuo, Ching-Chen
Wang, Xin Eric
author_facet Yan, Qianqi
Li, Hongquan
Jiang, Shan
Zhao, Yang
Guan, Xinze
Kuo, Ching-Chen
Wang, Xin Eric
contents Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in open-ended, real-world environments where inputs are messy, underspecified, and not always trustworthy. Unlike curated benchmarks, these settings frequently involve instructions that refer to missing objects or contradictory facts, rely on ambiguous references, or request infeasible actions. In such cases, success hinges not on task execution alone, but on a model's ability to detect when something is silently wrong. This paper presents a systematic analysis of how current MLLMs handle such implicit reasoning scenarios: cases where the flaw is not explicitly stated but must be inferred from context. Using a curated diagnostic suite spanning four categories of real-world failure modes, we evaluate six MLLMs, including o3 and GPT-4o, and find that models frequently fail to surface hidden issues, even when they possess the necessary perceptual and reasoning skills. Explicit prompting reveals that the underlying capabilities exist but are often suppressed in favor of user compliance. We further show that simple inference-time interventions, such as cautious persona prompting and, in particular, requiring a clarifying question, can dramatically recover performance. Our findings highlight a persistent gap between reasoning competence and behavioral compliance in current MLLMs and suggest practical strategies for making these models more trustworthy in underconstrained environments.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_00258
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Hidden in Plain Sight: Reasoning in Underspecified and Misspecified Scenarios for Multimodal LLMs
Yan, Qianqi
Li, Hongquan
Jiang, Shan
Zhao, Yang
Guan, Xinze
Kuo, Ching-Chen
Wang, Xin Eric
Artificial Intelligence
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in open-ended, real-world environments where inputs are messy, underspecified, and not always trustworthy. Unlike curated benchmarks, these settings frequently involve instructions that refer to missing objects or contradictory facts, rely on ambiguous references, or request infeasible actions. In such cases, success hinges not on task execution alone, but on a model's ability to detect when something is silently wrong. This paper presents a systematic analysis of how current MLLMs handle such implicit reasoning scenarios: cases where the flaw is not explicitly stated but must be inferred from context. Using a curated diagnostic suite spanning four categories of real-world failure modes, we evaluate six MLLMs, including o3 and GPT-4o, and find that models frequently fail to surface hidden issues, even when they possess the necessary perceptual and reasoning skills. Explicit prompting reveals that the underlying capabilities exist but are often suppressed in favor of user compliance. We further show that simple inference-time interventions, such as cautious persona prompting and, in particular, requiring a clarifying question, can dramatically recover performance. Our findings highlight a persistent gap between reasoning competence and behavioral compliance in current MLLMs and suggest practical strategies for making these models more trustworthy in underconstrained environments.
title Hidden in Plain Sight: Reasoning in Underspecified and Misspecified Scenarios for Multimodal LLMs
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00258