Improved Risk Ratio Approximation by Complementary Log-Log Models: A Comparison with Logistic Models
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866910979792568320 |
|---|---|
| author | Tsubota, Yuji Beppu, Kenji |
| author_facet | Tsubota, Yuji Beppu, Kenji |
| contents | Odds ratios obtained from logistic models fail to approximate risk ratios with common outcomes, leading to potential misinterpretations about exposure effects by practitioners. This article investigates the complementary log-log models as a practical alternative to produce risk ratio approximation. We demonstrate that the corresponding effect measure of complementary log-log models, called the complementary log ratio in this article, consistently provides a closer approximation to risk ratios than odds ratios. To compare the approximation accuracy, we adopt the one-parameter Aranda-Ordaz family of link functions, which includes both the logit and complementary log-log link functions as special cases. Within this unified framework, we implement a theoretical comparison of approximation accuracy between the complementary log ratio and the odds ratio, showing that the former always produces smaller approximation bias. Simulation studies further reinforce our theoretical findings. Given that the complementary log-log model is easily implemented in standard statistical software such as R and SAS, we encourage more frequent use of this model as a simple and effective alternative to logistic models when the goal is to approximate risk ratios more accurately. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_00889 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Improved Risk Ratio Approximation by Complementary Log-Log Models: A Comparison with Logistic Models Tsubota, Yuji Beppu, Kenji Methodology Applications Odds ratios obtained from logistic models fail to approximate risk ratios with common outcomes, leading to potential misinterpretations about exposure effects by practitioners. This article investigates the complementary log-log models as a practical alternative to produce risk ratio approximation. We demonstrate that the corresponding effect measure of complementary log-log models, called the complementary log ratio in this article, consistently provides a closer approximation to risk ratios than odds ratios. To compare the approximation accuracy, we adopt the one-parameter Aranda-Ordaz family of link functions, which includes both the logit and complementary log-log link functions as special cases. Within this unified framework, we implement a theoretical comparison of approximation accuracy between the complementary log ratio and the odds ratio, showing that the former always produces smaller approximation bias. Simulation studies further reinforce our theoretical findings. Given that the complementary log-log model is easily implemented in standard statistical software such as R and SAS, we encourage more frequent use of this model as a simple and effective alternative to logistic models when the goal is to approximate risk ratios more accurately. |
| title | Improved Risk Ratio Approximation by Complementary Log-Log Models: A Comparison with Logistic Models |
| topic | Methodology Applications |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00889 |