Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He, Shenghua, Xia, Tian, Zhou, Xuan, Wei, Hui
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02553
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912411169062912
author He, Shenghua
Xia, Tian
Zhou, Xuan
Wei, Hui
author_facet He, Shenghua
Xia, Tian
Zhou, Xuan
Wei, Hui
contents We study a common challenge in reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs): the Zero-Reward Assumption, where non-terminal actions (i.e., intermediate token generations) receive zero task-specific immediate reward, while only the final token receives a reward for the entire response. This assumption arises frequently in practice, as precise token-level rewards are often difficult or infeasible to obtain in LLM applications. In this work, we provide a unifying theoretical perspective. We introduce the Trajectory Policy Gradient Theorem, which shows that the policy gradient based on true, unknown token-level rewards can be unbiasedly estimated using only a response-level reward model, regardless of whether the Zero-Reward Assumption holds or not, for algorithms in the REINFORCE and Actor-Critic families. This result reveals that widely used methods such as PPO, GRPO, ReMax, and RLOO inherently possess the capacity to model token-level reward signals, offering a theoretical justification for response-level reward approaches. Our findings pave the way for more practical, efficient LLM fine-tuning, allowing developers to treat training algorithms as black boxes and focus on improving the response-level reward model with auxiliary sub-models. We also offer a detailed analysis of popular RL and non-RL methods, comparing their theoretical foundations and practical advantages across common LLM tasks. Finally, we propose a new algorithm: Token-Reinforced Policy Optimization (TRePO), a theoretically grounded method that is simpler than PPO, matches GRPO in memory efficiency, and holds promise for broad applicability.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_02553
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
He, Shenghua
Xia, Tian
Zhou, Xuan
Wei, Hui
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
We study a common challenge in reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs): the Zero-Reward Assumption, where non-terminal actions (i.e., intermediate token generations) receive zero task-specific immediate reward, while only the final token receives a reward for the entire response. This assumption arises frequently in practice, as precise token-level rewards are often difficult or infeasible to obtain in LLM applications. In this work, we provide a unifying theoretical perspective. We introduce the Trajectory Policy Gradient Theorem, which shows that the policy gradient based on true, unknown token-level rewards can be unbiasedly estimated using only a response-level reward model, regardless of whether the Zero-Reward Assumption holds or not, for algorithms in the REINFORCE and Actor-Critic families. This result reveals that widely used methods such as PPO, GRPO, ReMax, and RLOO inherently possess the capacity to model token-level reward signals, offering a theoretical justification for response-level reward approaches. Our findings pave the way for more practical, efficient LLM fine-tuning, allowing developers to treat training algorithms as black boxes and focus on improving the response-level reward model with auxiliary sub-models. We also offer a detailed analysis of popular RL and non-RL methods, comparing their theoretical foundations and practical advantages across common LLM tasks. Finally, we propose a new algorithm: Token-Reinforced Policy Optimization (TRePO), a theoretically grounded method that is simpler than PPO, matches GRPO in memory efficiency, and holds promise for broad applicability.
title Response-Level Rewards Are All You Need for Online Reinforcement Learning in LLMs: A Mathematical Perspective
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02553