Geometric standardized mean difference and its application to meta-analysis
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866915324292497408 |
|---|---|
| author | Shi, Jiandong Zhang, Xiaochen Lin, Lu Kwan, Hiu Yee Tong, Tiejun |
| author_facet | Shi, Jiandong Zhang, Xiaochen Lin, Lu Kwan, Hiu Yee Tong, Tiejun |
| contents | The standardized mean difference (SMD) is a widely used measure of effect size, particularly common in psychology, clinical trials, and meta-analysis involving continuous outcomes. Traditionally, under the equal variance assumption, the SMD is defined as the mean difference divided by a common standard deviation. This approach is prevalent in meta-analysis but can be overly restrictive in clinical practice. To accommodate unequal variances, the conventional method averages the two variances arithmetically, which does not allow for an unbiased estimation of the SMD. Inspired by this, we propose a geometric approach to averaging the variances, resulting in a novel measure for standardizing the mean difference with unequal variances. We further propose the Cohen-type and Hedges-type estimators for the new SMD, and derive their statistical properties including the confidence intervals. Simulation results show that the Hedges-type estimator performs optimally across various scenarios, demonstrating lower bias, lower mean squared error, and improved coverage probability. A real-world meta-analysis also illustrates that our new SMD and its estimators provide valuable insights to the existing literature and can be highly recommended for practical use. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_03639 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Geometric standardized mean difference and its application to meta-analysis Shi, Jiandong Zhang, Xiaochen Lin, Lu Kwan, Hiu Yee Tong, Tiejun Methodology The standardized mean difference (SMD) is a widely used measure of effect size, particularly common in psychology, clinical trials, and meta-analysis involving continuous outcomes. Traditionally, under the equal variance assumption, the SMD is defined as the mean difference divided by a common standard deviation. This approach is prevalent in meta-analysis but can be overly restrictive in clinical practice. To accommodate unequal variances, the conventional method averages the two variances arithmetically, which does not allow for an unbiased estimation of the SMD. Inspired by this, we propose a geometric approach to averaging the variances, resulting in a novel measure for standardizing the mean difference with unequal variances. We further propose the Cohen-type and Hedges-type estimators for the new SMD, and derive their statistical properties including the confidence intervals. Simulation results show that the Hedges-type estimator performs optimally across various scenarios, demonstrating lower bias, lower mean squared error, and improved coverage probability. A real-world meta-analysis also illustrates that our new SMD and its estimators provide valuable insights to the existing literature and can be highly recommended for practical use. |
| title | Geometric standardized mean difference and its application to meta-analysis |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03639 |