Curse of Slicing: Why Sliced Mutual Information is a Deceptive Measure of Statistical Dependence

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Semenenko, Alexander, Butakov, Ivan, Frolov, Alexey, Oseledets, Ivan
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866918239451217920
author Semenenko, Alexander
Butakov, Ivan
Frolov, Alexey
Oseledets, Ivan
author_facet Semenenko, Alexander
Butakov, Ivan
Frolov, Alexey
Oseledets, Ivan
contents Sliced Mutual Information (SMI) is widely used as a scalable alternative to mutual information for measuring non-linear statistical dependence. Despite its advantages, such as faster convergence, robustness to high dimensionality, and nullification only under statistical independence, we demonstrate that SMI is highly susceptible to data manipulation and exhibits counterintuitive behavior. Through extensive benchmarking and theoretical analysis, we show that SMI saturates easily, fails to detect increases in statistical dependence, prioritizes redundancy over informative content, and in some cases, performs worse than correlation coefficient.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_04053
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Curse of Slicing: Why Sliced Mutual Information is a Deceptive Measure of Statistical Dependence
Semenenko, Alexander
Butakov, Ivan
Frolov, Alexey
Oseledets, Ivan
Machine Learning
Information Theory
94A16, 68T07, 94A17
E.4; H.1.1
Sliced Mutual Information (SMI) is widely used as a scalable alternative to mutual information for measuring non-linear statistical dependence. Despite its advantages, such as faster convergence, robustness to high dimensionality, and nullification only under statistical independence, we demonstrate that SMI is highly susceptible to data manipulation and exhibits counterintuitive behavior. Through extensive benchmarking and theoretical analysis, we show that SMI saturates easily, fails to detect increases in statistical dependence, prioritizes redundancy over informative content, and in some cases, performs worse than correlation coefficient.
title Curse of Slicing: Why Sliced Mutual Information is a Deceptive Measure of Statistical Dependence
topic Machine Learning
Information Theory
94A16, 68T07, 94A17
E.4; H.1.1
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04053