Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04742 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914459806597120 |
|---|---|
| author | Lundqvist, Oliver G. S. Oliveira, Fabricio |
| author_facet | Lundqvist, Oliver G. S. Oliveira, Fabricio |
| contents | Neural networks have been applied to control problems, typically by combining data, differential equation residuals, and objective costs in the training loss or by incorporating auxiliary architectural components. Instead, we propose a streamlined approach that decouples the control problem from the training process, rendering these additional layers of complexity unnecessary. In particular, our analysis and computational experiments demonstrate that a simple neural operator architecture, such as DeepONet, coupled with an unconstrained optimization routine, can solve tracking-type partial differential equation (PDE) constrained control problems with a single physics-informed training phase and a subsequent optimization phase. We achieve this by adding a penalty term to the cost function based on the differential equation residual to penalize deviations from the PDE constraint. This allows gradient computations with respect to the control using automatic differentiation through the trained neural operator within an iterative optimization routine, while satisfying the PDE constraints. Once trained, the same neural operator can be reused across different tracking targets without retraining. We benchmark our method on scalar elliptic (Poisson's equation), nonlinear transport (viscous Burgers' equation), and flow (Stokes equation) control problems. For the Poisson and Burgers problems, we compare against adjoint-based solvers: for the time-dependent Burgers problem, the approach achieves competitive accuracy with iteration times up to four times faster, while for the linear Poisson problem, the adjoint method retains superior accuracy, suggesting the approach is best suited to nonlinear and time-dependent settings. For the flow control problem, we verify the feasibility of the optimized control through a reference forward solver. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_04742 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Employing Deep Neural Operators for PDE control by decoupling training and optimization Lundqvist, Oliver G. S. Oliveira, Fabricio Optimization and Control Artificial Intelligence Neural networks have been applied to control problems, typically by combining data, differential equation residuals, and objective costs in the training loss or by incorporating auxiliary architectural components. Instead, we propose a streamlined approach that decouples the control problem from the training process, rendering these additional layers of complexity unnecessary. In particular, our analysis and computational experiments demonstrate that a simple neural operator architecture, such as DeepONet, coupled with an unconstrained optimization routine, can solve tracking-type partial differential equation (PDE) constrained control problems with a single physics-informed training phase and a subsequent optimization phase. We achieve this by adding a penalty term to the cost function based on the differential equation residual to penalize deviations from the PDE constraint. This allows gradient computations with respect to the control using automatic differentiation through the trained neural operator within an iterative optimization routine, while satisfying the PDE constraints. Once trained, the same neural operator can be reused across different tracking targets without retraining. We benchmark our method on scalar elliptic (Poisson's equation), nonlinear transport (viscous Burgers' equation), and flow (Stokes equation) control problems. For the Poisson and Burgers problems, we compare against adjoint-based solvers: for the time-dependent Burgers problem, the approach achieves competitive accuracy with iteration times up to four times faster, while for the linear Poisson problem, the adjoint method retains superior accuracy, suggesting the approach is best suited to nonlinear and time-dependent settings. For the flow control problem, we verify the feasibility of the optimized control through a reference forward solver. |
| title | Employing Deep Neural Operators for PDE control by decoupling training and optimization |
| topic | Optimization and Control Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04742 |