Quantitative Language Automata
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918417896833024 |
|---|---|
| author | Henzinger, Thomas A. Kebis, Pavol Mazzocchi, Nicolas Saraç, N. Ege |
| author_facet | Henzinger, Thomas A. Kebis, Pavol Mazzocchi, Nicolas Saraç, N. Ege |
| contents | A quantitative word automaton (QWA) defines a function from infinite words to values. For example, every infinite run of a limit-average QWA A obtains a mean payoff, and every word w is assigned the maximal mean payoff obtained by nondeterministic runs of A over w. We introduce quantitative language automata (QLAs) that define functions from language generators (i.e., implementations) to values, where a language generator can be nonprobabilistic, defining a set of infinite words, or probabilistic, defining a probability measure over infinite words. A QLA consists of a QWA and a language aggregator. For example, given a QWA A, the infimum aggregator maps each language L to the greatest lower bound assigned by A to any word in L. For boolean value sets, QWAs capture trace properties, and QLAs capture hyperproperties. For more general value sets, QLAs serve as a specification language for a generalization of hyperproperties, called quantitative hyperproperties. A nonprobabilistic (resp. probabilistic) quantitative hyperproperty assigns a value to each set (resp. distribution) G of traces, e.g., the minimal (resp. expected) average response time exhibited by the traces in G (resp. by traces sampled according to G). We give several examples of quantitative hyperproperties and investigate three paradigmatic problems for QLAs: evaluation, nonemptiness, and universality. In the evaluation problem, given a QLA AA and an implementation G, we ask for the value that AA assigns to G. In the nonemptiness (resp. universality) problem, given a QLA AA, a threshold k, and a comparison in {>, >=} we ask whether AA assigns a value meeting the threshold to some (resp. every) language. We provide a comprehensive picture of decidability and complexity for these problems for QLAs with common aggregators as well as their restrictions to omega-regular languages and distributions generated by finite Markov chains. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_05158 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Quantitative Language Automata Henzinger, Thomas A. Kebis, Pavol Mazzocchi, Nicolas Saraç, N. Ege Formal Languages and Automata Theory A quantitative word automaton (QWA) defines a function from infinite words to values. For example, every infinite run of a limit-average QWA A obtains a mean payoff, and every word w is assigned the maximal mean payoff obtained by nondeterministic runs of A over w. We introduce quantitative language automata (QLAs) that define functions from language generators (i.e., implementations) to values, where a language generator can be nonprobabilistic, defining a set of infinite words, or probabilistic, defining a probability measure over infinite words. A QLA consists of a QWA and a language aggregator. For example, given a QWA A, the infimum aggregator maps each language L to the greatest lower bound assigned by A to any word in L. For boolean value sets, QWAs capture trace properties, and QLAs capture hyperproperties. For more general value sets, QLAs serve as a specification language for a generalization of hyperproperties, called quantitative hyperproperties. A nonprobabilistic (resp. probabilistic) quantitative hyperproperty assigns a value to each set (resp. distribution) G of traces, e.g., the minimal (resp. expected) average response time exhibited by the traces in G (resp. by traces sampled according to G). We give several examples of quantitative hyperproperties and investigate three paradigmatic problems for QLAs: evaluation, nonemptiness, and universality. In the evaluation problem, given a QLA AA and an implementation G, we ask for the value that AA assigns to G. In the nonemptiness (resp. universality) problem, given a QLA AA, a threshold k, and a comparison in {>, >=} we ask whether AA assigns a value meeting the threshold to some (resp. every) language. We provide a comprehensive picture of decidability and complexity for these problems for QLAs with common aggregators as well as their restrictions to omega-regular languages and distributions generated by finite Markov chains. |
| title | Quantitative Language Automata |
| topic | Formal Languages and Automata Theory |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05158 |