Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06418 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- We analyze two dusty star-forming galaxies at $z=6.6$. These galaxies are selected from the ASPIRE survey, a JWST Cycle-1 medium and ALMA Cycle-9 large program targeting 25 quasars and their environments at $z\simeq6.5 - 6.8$. These galaxies are identified as companions to UV-luminous quasars and robustly detected in ALMA continuum and [C II] emission, yet they are extraordinarily faint at the NIRCam wavelengths (down to $>28.0$ AB mag in the F356W band). They are more obscured than galaxies like Arp220, and thus we refer to them as "NIRCam-dark" starburst galaxies (star formation rate $\simeq 80 - 250\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$). Such galaxies are typically missed by (sub)-millimeter blank-field surveys. From the star-formation history (SFH), we show that the NIRCam-dark galaxies are viable progenitors of massive quiescent galaxies at $z\gtrsim4$ and descendants of UV-luminous galaxies at $z>10$. Although it is hard to constrain their number density from a quasar survey, we conclude that NIRCam-dark galaxies can be as abundant as $n\sim10^{-5.5}$ Mpc$^{-3}$ assuming a light halo occupation model. If true, this would equal to $\sim$30% of the number densities of both the quiescent galaxies at $z\gtrsim4$ and UV-luminous galaxies at $z>10$. We further predict that analogs at $z\sim8$ should exist according to the SFH of early massive quiescent galaxies. However, they may fall below the current detection limits of wide JWST and ALMA surveys, thus remaining "JWST-dark". To fully trace the evolution of massive galaxies and dust-obscured cosmic star formation at $z\gtrsim8$, wide-field JWST/NIRCam imaging and slitless spectroscopic surveys of early protoclusters are essential.