A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909765169315840 |
|---|---|
| author | Banerjee, Heerok |
| author_facet | Banerjee, Heerok |
| contents | Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocols are the underlying paradigms which dictate the transmission & reception of data in any network. Particularly for Low-powered Lossy Networks (LLNs), the design and selection of appropiate MAC-layer protocols is crucial inorder to satisfy several networking objectives such as joining time, network lifetime, energy consumption, end-to-end-delay, etc. In this report, we have presented a comparative analysis between Contiki-MAC and Orchestra-enabled TSCH protocol which provides insights towards the network joining & convergence time as well as an estimate of the energy consumption required of build such LLNs. Our results indicates that Contiki-MAC outperforms Orchestra-enabled TSCH by a factor of 13 times in network formation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_06688 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH Banerjee, Heerok Networking and Internet Architecture Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocols are the underlying paradigms which dictate the transmission & reception of data in any network. Particularly for Low-powered Lossy Networks (LLNs), the design and selection of appropiate MAC-layer protocols is crucial inorder to satisfy several networking objectives such as joining time, network lifetime, energy consumption, end-to-end-delay, etc. In this report, we have presented a comparative analysis between Contiki-MAC and Orchestra-enabled TSCH protocol which provides insights towards the network joining & convergence time as well as an estimate of the energy consumption required of build such LLNs. Our results indicates that Contiki-MAC outperforms Orchestra-enabled TSCH by a factor of 13 times in network formation. |
| title | A Comparative Analyses Of Network Formation In Low-power Lossy Networks: ContikiMAC vs Orchestra-enabled TSCH |
| topic | Networking and Internet Architecture |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06688 |