Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Makarova, Alena, Abbas, Houssam
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06959
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866910995054592000
author Makarova, Alena
Abbas, Houssam
author_facet Makarova, Alena
Abbas, Houssam
contents Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are the most common model for decision making under uncertainty in the Machine Learning community. An MDP captures non-determinism, probabilistic uncertainty, and an explicit model of action. A Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent learns to act in an MDP by maximizing a utility function. This paper considers the problem of learning a decision policy that maximizes utility subject to satisfying a constraint expressed in deontic logic. In this setup, the utility captures the agent's mission - such as going quickly from A to B. The deontic formula represents (ethical, social, situational) constraints on how the agent might achieve its mission by prohibiting classes of behaviors. We use the logic of Expected Act Utilitarianism, a probabilistic stit logic that can be interpreted over controlled MDPs. We develop a variation on policy improvement, and show that it reaches a constrained local maximum of the mission utility. Given that in stit logic, an agent's duty is derived from value maximization, this can be seen as a way of acting to simultaneously maximize two value functions, one of which is implicit, in a bi-level structure. We illustrate these results with experiments on sample MDPs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_06959
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Deontically Constrained Policy Improvement in Reinforcement Learning Agents
Makarova, Alena
Abbas, Houssam
Artificial Intelligence
60J10 (Primary), 60J20 (Primary), 60J22 (Primary), 93E20 (Secondary)
D.2.4; F.3.1; I.2.8
Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are the most common model for decision making under uncertainty in the Machine Learning community. An MDP captures non-determinism, probabilistic uncertainty, and an explicit model of action. A Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent learns to act in an MDP by maximizing a utility function. This paper considers the problem of learning a decision policy that maximizes utility subject to satisfying a constraint expressed in deontic logic. In this setup, the utility captures the agent's mission - such as going quickly from A to B. The deontic formula represents (ethical, social, situational) constraints on how the agent might achieve its mission by prohibiting classes of behaviors. We use the logic of Expected Act Utilitarianism, a probabilistic stit logic that can be interpreted over controlled MDPs. We develop a variation on policy improvement, and show that it reaches a constrained local maximum of the mission utility. Given that in stit logic, an agent's duty is derived from value maximization, this can be seen as a way of acting to simultaneously maximize two value functions, one of which is implicit, in a bi-level structure. We illustrate these results with experiments on sample MDPs.
title Deontically Constrained Policy Improvement in Reinforcement Learning Agents
topic Artificial Intelligence
60J10 (Primary), 60J20 (Primary), 60J22 (Primary), 93E20 (Secondary)
D.2.4; F.3.1; I.2.8
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06959