Redshift ~2.7 is not special

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Joseph, Prajwel
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866908553731637248
author Joseph, Prajwel
author_facet Joseph, Prajwel
contents Galikyan et al. (2025) reported a statistically significant change in galaxy spectral properties at redshift $z$ $\simeq$ 2.7 based on a Kolmogorov Stochasticity Parameter analysis of JWST spectroscopic data of galaxies. In this comment, we demonstrate that their result is critically driven by a single outlier in the dataset. This outlier arises from the use of a questionable redshift estimate for one spectrum. When the outlier is removed or the redshift is corrected, the claimed transition at $z$ $\simeq$ 2.7 disappears entirely. By independently reproducing their analysis, we demonstrate that the claimed feature is not a robust statistical signal, but an artefact of this anomalous data point.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_07774
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Redshift ~2.7 is not special
Joseph, Prajwel
Astrophysics of Galaxies
Galikyan et al. (2025) reported a statistically significant change in galaxy spectral properties at redshift $z$ $\simeq$ 2.7 based on a Kolmogorov Stochasticity Parameter analysis of JWST spectroscopic data of galaxies. In this comment, we demonstrate that their result is critically driven by a single outlier in the dataset. This outlier arises from the use of a questionable redshift estimate for one spectrum. When the outlier is removed or the redshift is corrected, the claimed transition at $z$ $\simeq$ 2.7 disappears entirely. By independently reproducing their analysis, we demonstrate that the claimed feature is not a robust statistical signal, but an artefact of this anomalous data point.
title Redshift ~2.7 is not special
topic Astrophysics of Galaxies
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07774