Course Project Report: Comparing MCMC and Variational Inference for Bayesian Probabilistic Matrix Factorization on the MovieLens Dataset

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Ruixuan, Weng, Xiangxiang
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866918057290498048
author Xu, Ruixuan
Weng, Xiangxiang
author_facet Xu, Ruixuan
Weng, Xiangxiang
contents This is a course project report with complete methodology, experiments, references and mathematical derivations. Matrix factorization [1] is a widely used technique in recommendation systems. Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF) [2] extends traditional matrix factorization by incorporating probability distributions over latent factors, allowing for uncertainty quantification. However, computing the posterior distribution is intractable due to the high-dimensional integral. To address this, we employ two Bayesian inference methods: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) [3, 4] and Variational Inference (VI) [5, 6] to approximate the posterior. We evaluate their performance on MovieLens dataset [7] and compare their convergence speed, predictive accuracy, and computational efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that VI offers faster convergence, while MCMC provides more accurate posterior estimates.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_09928
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Course Project Report: Comparing MCMC and Variational Inference for Bayesian Probabilistic Matrix Factorization on the MovieLens Dataset
Xu, Ruixuan
Weng, Xiangxiang
Machine Learning
This is a course project report with complete methodology, experiments, references and mathematical derivations. Matrix factorization [1] is a widely used technique in recommendation systems. Probabilistic Matrix Factorization (PMF) [2] extends traditional matrix factorization by incorporating probability distributions over latent factors, allowing for uncertainty quantification. However, computing the posterior distribution is intractable due to the high-dimensional integral. To address this, we employ two Bayesian inference methods: Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) [3, 4] and Variational Inference (VI) [5, 6] to approximate the posterior. We evaluate their performance on MovieLens dataset [7] and compare their convergence speed, predictive accuracy, and computational efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that VI offers faster convergence, while MCMC provides more accurate posterior estimates.
title Course Project Report: Comparing MCMC and Variational Inference for Bayesian Probabilistic Matrix Factorization on the MovieLens Dataset
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09928