T$^2$-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866912828448833536 |
|---|---|
| author | Strich, Jan Isgorur, Enes Kutay Trescher, Maximilian Biemann, Chris Semmann, Martin |
| author_facet | Strich, Jan Isgorur, Enes Kutay Trescher, Maximilian Biemann, Chris Semmann, Martin |
| contents | Since many real-world documents combine textual and tabular data, robust Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are essential for effectively accessing and analyzing such content to support complex reasoning tasks. Therefore, this paper introduces $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$, a benchmark comprising $\textbf{23,088}$ question-context-answer triples, designed to evaluate RAG methods on real-world text-and-table data. Unlike typical QA datasets that operate under $\textit{Oracle Context}$ settings, $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$ challenges models to first retrieve the correct context before conducting numerical reasoning. Existing QA datasets containing text-and-table data typically contain context-dependent questions, which may yield multiple correct answers depending on the provided context. To address this, we transform SOTA datasets into a context-independent format, validated by experts as 91.3% context-independent questions, enabling reliable RAG evaluation. Our comprehensive evaluation identifies $\textit{Hybrid BM25}$ , a technique that combines dense and sparse vectors, as the most effective approach for text-and-table data. However, results demonstrate that $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$ remains challenging even for SOTA LLMs and RAG methods. Further ablation studies examine the impact of embedding models and corpus size on retrieval performance. $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$ provides a realistic and rigorous benchmark for existing RAG methods on text-and-table data. Code and dataset are available online: https://github.com/uhh-hcds/g4kmu-paper |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_12071 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | T$^2$-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation Strich, Jan Isgorur, Enes Kutay Trescher, Maximilian Biemann, Chris Semmann, Martin Information Retrieval Since many real-world documents combine textual and tabular data, robust Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) systems are essential for effectively accessing and analyzing such content to support complex reasoning tasks. Therefore, this paper introduces $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$, a benchmark comprising $\textbf{23,088}$ question-context-answer triples, designed to evaluate RAG methods on real-world text-and-table data. Unlike typical QA datasets that operate under $\textit{Oracle Context}$ settings, $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$ challenges models to first retrieve the correct context before conducting numerical reasoning. Existing QA datasets containing text-and-table data typically contain context-dependent questions, which may yield multiple correct answers depending on the provided context. To address this, we transform SOTA datasets into a context-independent format, validated by experts as 91.3% context-independent questions, enabling reliable RAG evaluation. Our comprehensive evaluation identifies $\textit{Hybrid BM25}$ , a technique that combines dense and sparse vectors, as the most effective approach for text-and-table data. However, results demonstrate that $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$ remains challenging even for SOTA LLMs and RAG methods. Further ablation studies examine the impact of embedding models and corpus size on retrieval performance. $\textbf{$T^2$-RAGBench}$ provides a realistic and rigorous benchmark for existing RAG methods on text-and-table data. Code and dataset are available online: https://github.com/uhh-hcds/g4kmu-paper |
| title | T$^2$-RAGBench: Text-and-Table Benchmark for Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation |
| topic | Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12071 |