Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Oz, Zeyneddin, Korde, Shreyas, Bock, Marius, Van Laerhoven, Kristof
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16840
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915490933243904
author Oz, Zeyneddin
Korde, Shreyas
Bock, Marius
Van Laerhoven, Kristof
author_facet Oz, Zeyneddin
Korde, Shreyas
Bock, Marius
Van Laerhoven, Kristof
contents The rapid evolution of sensors and resource-efficient machine learning models has spurred the widespread adoption of wearable fitness tracking devices. Equipped with inertial sensors, such devices can continuously capture physical movements for fitness technology (FitTech), enabling applications from sports optimization to preventive healthcare. Traditional Centralized Learning approaches to detect fitness activities struggle with data privacy concerns, regulatory restrictions, and communication inefficiencies. In contrast, Federated Learning (FL) enables a decentralized model training by communicating model updates rather than potentially private wearable sensor data. Applying FL to FitTech presents unique challenges, such as data imbalance, lack of labeled data, heterogeneous user activities, and trade-offs between personalization and generalization. To simplify research on FitTech in FL, we present the FedFitTech baseline, under the Flower framework, which is publicly available and widely used by both industry and academic researchers. Additionally, to illustrate its usage, this paper presents a case study that implements a system based on the FedFitTech baseline, incorporating a client-side early stopping strategy and comparing the results. For instance, this system allows wearable devices to optimize the trade-off between capturing common fitness activities and preserving individuals' nuances, thereby enhancing both the scalability and efficiency of privacy-aware fitness tracking applications. The results show that this reduces the overall redundant communications by 13%, while maintaining the overall recognition performance at a negligible recognition cost by 1%. Thus, the FedFitTech baseline creates a foundation for a wide range of new research and development opportunities in FitTech, and it is available as open source at: https://github.com/shreyaskorde16/FedFitTech
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_16840
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle FedFitTech: A Baseline in Federated Learning for Fitness Tracking
Oz, Zeyneddin
Korde, Shreyas
Bock, Marius
Van Laerhoven, Kristof
Machine Learning
The rapid evolution of sensors and resource-efficient machine learning models has spurred the widespread adoption of wearable fitness tracking devices. Equipped with inertial sensors, such devices can continuously capture physical movements for fitness technology (FitTech), enabling applications from sports optimization to preventive healthcare. Traditional Centralized Learning approaches to detect fitness activities struggle with data privacy concerns, regulatory restrictions, and communication inefficiencies. In contrast, Federated Learning (FL) enables a decentralized model training by communicating model updates rather than potentially private wearable sensor data. Applying FL to FitTech presents unique challenges, such as data imbalance, lack of labeled data, heterogeneous user activities, and trade-offs between personalization and generalization. To simplify research on FitTech in FL, we present the FedFitTech baseline, under the Flower framework, which is publicly available and widely used by both industry and academic researchers. Additionally, to illustrate its usage, this paper presents a case study that implements a system based on the FedFitTech baseline, incorporating a client-side early stopping strategy and comparing the results. For instance, this system allows wearable devices to optimize the trade-off between capturing common fitness activities and preserving individuals' nuances, thereby enhancing both the scalability and efficiency of privacy-aware fitness tracking applications. The results show that this reduces the overall redundant communications by 13%, while maintaining the overall recognition performance at a negligible recognition cost by 1%. Thus, the FedFitTech baseline creates a foundation for a wide range of new research and development opportunities in FitTech, and it is available as open source at: https://github.com/shreyaskorde16/FedFitTech
title FedFitTech: A Baseline in Federated Learning for Fitness Tracking
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16840