Cover Image

Adaptive Request Scheduling for CodeLLM Serving with SLA Guarantees

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Chang, Shi, Chen, Boyuan, Thangarajah, Kishanthan, Lutfiyya, Hanan, Hassan, Ahmed E.
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Context-Aware CodeLLM Eviction for AI-assisted Coding
by: Thangarajah, Kishanthan, et al.
Published: (2025)

SynConfRoute: Syntax-Aware Routing for Efficient Code Completion with Small CodeLLMs
by: Thangarajah, Kishanthan, et al.
Published: (2026)

SLA-Awareness for AI-assisted coding
by: Thangarajah, Kishanthan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Software Performance Engineering for Foundation Model-Powered Software
by: Zhang, Haoxiang, et al.
Published: (2024)

Mastering the Craft of Data Synthesis for CodeLLMs
by: Chen, Meng, et al.
Published: (2024)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

CodeMMLU: A Multi-Task Benchmark for Assessing Code Understanding & Reasoning Capabilities of CodeLLMs
by: Manh, Dung Nguyen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Rethinking Software Engineering in the Foundation Model Era: A Curated Catalogue of Challenges in the Development of Trustworthy FMware
by: Hassan, Ahmed E., et al.
Published: (2024)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
by: Jo, Young, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
by: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can Large Language Models Serve as Evaluators for Code Summarization?
by: Wu, Yang, et al.
Published: (2024)

On the Effect of Token Merging on Pre-trained Models for Code
by: Saad, Mootez, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Hitchhikers Guide to Production-ready Trustworthy Foundation Model powered Software (FMware)
by: Vasilevski, Kirill, et al.
Published: (2025)

Do AI Coding Agents Log Like Humans? An Empirical Study
by: Ouatiti, Youssef Esseddiq, et al.
Published: (2026)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

On Unified Prompt Tuning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Chen, Xinyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Rethinking Software Engineering in the Foundation Model Era: From Task-Driven AI Copilots to Goal-Driven AI Pair Programmers
by: Hassan, Ahmed E., et al.
Published: (2024)

Towards AI-Native Software Engineering (SE 3.0): A Vision and a Challenge Roadmap
by: Hassan, Ahmed E., et al.
Published: (2024)

AIDev: Studying AI Coding Agents on GitHub
by: Li, Hao, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
by: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Published: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
by: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Published: (2026)

Analyzing Message-Code Inconsistency in AI Coding Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Gong, Jingzhi, et al.
Published: (2026)

Inducing Vulnerable Code Generation in LLM Coding Assistants
by: Zeng, Binqi, et al.
Published: (2025)

Knowledge-Guided Prompt Learning for Request Quality Assurance in Public Code Review
by: Li, Lin, et al.
Published: (2024)

Demystifying Feature Requests: Leveraging LLMs to Refine Feature Requests in Open-Source Software
by: KC, Pragyan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Characterizing Multi-Hunk Patches: Divergence, Proximity, and LLM Repair Challenges
by: Nashid, Noor, et al.
Published: (2025)

Code Change Characteristics and Description Alignment: A Comparative Study of Agentic versus Human Pull Requests
by: Pham, Dung, et al.
Published: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

AgenticSZZ: Temporal Knowledge Graph-Guided Agentic Bug-Inducing Commit Identification
by: Shi, Yu, et al.
Published: (2026)

When Elo Lies: Hidden Biases in Codeforces-Based Evaluation of Large Language Models
by: Zheng, Shenyu, et al.
Published: (2026)

Assessing and Improving the Representativeness of Code Generation Benchmarks Using Knowledge Units (KUs) of Programming Languages -- An Empirical Study
by: Ahasanuzzaman, Md, et al.
Published: (2026)

Beyond Bug Fixes: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Merge Code Quality Issues in Agent-Generated Pull Requests
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2026)

Human or LLM? A Comparative Study on Accessible Code Generation Capability
by: Suh, Hyunjae, et al.
Published: (2025)

LLM-Redactor: An Empirical Evaluation of Eight Techniques for Privacy-Preserving LLM Requests
by: Agyemang, Justice Owusu, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
by: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Published: (2026)

AdaptiveLLM: A Framework for Selecting Optimal Cost-Efficient LLM for Code-Generation Based on CoT Length
by: Cheng, Junhang, et al.
Published: (2025)