Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20746 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911474202443776 |
|---|---|
| author | Nief, Todd Reber, David Richardson, Sean Holtzman, Ari |
| author_facet | Nief, Todd Reber, David Richardson, Sean Holtzman, Ari |
| contents | When an LLM learns a new fact during finetuning (e.g., new movie releases, newly elected pope, etc.), where does this information go? Are entities enriched with relation information immediately, or do models recall information just-in-time before a prediction? Or, are "all of the above" true, with LLMs implementing multiple redundant heuristics? Existing localization approaches (e.g., activation patching) are ill-suited for this analysis because they usually replace parts of the residual stream, thus overriding previous information. To fill this interpretability gap, we propose dynamic weight grafting, an analysis technique that selectively grafts subsets of weights from a finetuned model onto a pretrained model. Using this technique, we show two separate pathways for retrieving finetuned relation information: 1) "enriching" the residual stream with relation information while processing the tokens that correspond to an entity (e.g., "Zendaya" in "Zendaya co-starred with Timothée Chalamet" and 2) "recalling" this information at the final token position before generating a target fact. In some cases, models need information from both of these pathways to correctly generate finetuned facts while, in other cases, either the "enrichment" or "recall" pathway alone is sufficient. We localize the "recall" pathway to model components -- finding that "recall" occurs via both task-specific attention mechanisms and an entity-specific extraction step in the feedforward networks of the final layers before prediction. By targeting model components and parameters, as opposed to just activations, we are able to understand the mechanisms by which finetuned knowledge is retrieved during generation. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_20746 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Dynamic Weight Grafting: Localizing Finetuned Factual Knowledge in Transformers Nief, Todd Reber, David Richardson, Sean Holtzman, Ari Machine Learning When an LLM learns a new fact during finetuning (e.g., new movie releases, newly elected pope, etc.), where does this information go? Are entities enriched with relation information immediately, or do models recall information just-in-time before a prediction? Or, are "all of the above" true, with LLMs implementing multiple redundant heuristics? Existing localization approaches (e.g., activation patching) are ill-suited for this analysis because they usually replace parts of the residual stream, thus overriding previous information. To fill this interpretability gap, we propose dynamic weight grafting, an analysis technique that selectively grafts subsets of weights from a finetuned model onto a pretrained model. Using this technique, we show two separate pathways for retrieving finetuned relation information: 1) "enriching" the residual stream with relation information while processing the tokens that correspond to an entity (e.g., "Zendaya" in "Zendaya co-starred with Timothée Chalamet" and 2) "recalling" this information at the final token position before generating a target fact. In some cases, models need information from both of these pathways to correctly generate finetuned facts while, in other cases, either the "enrichment" or "recall" pathway alone is sufficient. We localize the "recall" pathway to model components -- finding that "recall" occurs via both task-specific attention mechanisms and an entity-specific extraction step in the feedforward networks of the final layers before prediction. By targeting model components and parameters, as opposed to just activations, we are able to understand the mechanisms by which finetuned knowledge is retrieved during generation. |
| title | Dynamic Weight Grafting: Localizing Finetuned Factual Knowledge in Transformers |
| topic | Machine Learning |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20746 |