_version_ 1866913912954290176
author Chung, Sun-Ju
Hwang, Kyu-Ha
Yee, Jennifer C.
Gould, Andrew
Bond, Ian A.
Yang, Hongjing
Albrow, Michael D.
Jung, Youn Kil
Han, Cheongho
Ryu, Yoon-Hyun
Shin, In-Gu
Shvartzvald, Yossi
Zang, Weicheng
Cha, Sang-Mok
Kim, Dong-Jin
Kim, Seung-Lee
Lee, Chung-Uk
Lee, Dong-Joo
Lee, Yongseok
Park, Byeong-Gon
Pogge, Richard W.
Abe, Fumio
Bennett, David P.
Bhattacharya, Aparna
Fukui, Akihiko
Hamada, Ryusei
Hirao, Yuki
Silva, Stela Ishitani
Koshimoto, Naoki
Miyazaki, Shota
Muraki, Yasushi
Nagai, Tutumi
Nunota, Kansuke
Olmschenk, Greg
Ranc, Clément
Rattenbury, Nicholas J.
Satoh, Yuki
Sumi, Takahiro
Suzuki, Daisuke
Terry, Sean K.
Tristram, Paul J.
Vandorou, Aikaterini
Yama, Hibiki
author_facet Chung, Sun-Ju
Hwang, Kyu-Ha
Yee, Jennifer C.
Gould, Andrew
Bond, Ian A.
Yang, Hongjing
Albrow, Michael D.
Jung, Youn Kil
Han, Cheongho
Ryu, Yoon-Hyun
Shin, In-Gu
Shvartzvald, Yossi
Zang, Weicheng
Cha, Sang-Mok
Kim, Dong-Jin
Kim, Seung-Lee
Lee, Chung-Uk
Lee, Dong-Joo
Lee, Yongseok
Park, Byeong-Gon
Pogge, Richard W.
Abe, Fumio
Bennett, David P.
Bhattacharya, Aparna
Fukui, Akihiko
Hamada, Ryusei
Hirao, Yuki
Silva, Stela Ishitani
Koshimoto, Naoki
Miyazaki, Shota
Muraki, Yasushi
Nagai, Tutumi
Nunota, Kansuke
Olmschenk, Greg
Ranc, Clément
Rattenbury, Nicholas J.
Satoh, Yuki
Sumi, Takahiro
Suzuki, Daisuke
Terry, Sean K.
Tristram, Paul J.
Vandorou, Aikaterini
Yama, Hibiki
contents We present the analysis of a microlensing event KMT-2022-BLG-0086 of which the overall light curve is not described by a binary-lens single-source (2L1S) model, which suggests the existence of an extra lens or an extra source. We found that the event is best explained by the binary-lens binary-source (2L2S) model, but the 2L2S model is only favored over the triple-lens single-source (3L1S) model by $Δχ^{2} \simeq 9$. Although the event has noticeable anomalies around the peak of the light curve, they are not enough covered to constrain the angular Einstein radius $θ_{\rm E}$, thus we only measure the minimum angular Einstein radius $θ_{\rm E,min}$. From the Bayesian analysis, it is found that that the binary lens system is a binary star with masses of $(m_1,m_2)=(0.46^{+0.35}_{-0.25}\, M_\odot, 0.75^{+0.67}_{-0.55}\, M_\odot)$ at a distance of $D_{\rm L}=5.87^{+1.21}_{-1.79}$ kpc, while the triple lens system is a brown dwarf or a massive giant planet in a low-mass binary-star system with masses of $(m_1,m_2,m_3)=(0.43^{+0.41}_{-0.35}\, M_\odot, 0.056^{+0.055}_{-0.047}\, M_\odot, 20.84^{+20.20}_{-17.04}\, M_{\rm J})$ at a distance of $D_{\rm L}=4.06^{+1.39}_{-3.28}$ kpc, indicating a disk lens system. The 2L2S model yields the relative lens-source proper motion of $μ_{\rm rel} \geqslant 4.6\, \rm mas\, yr^{-1}$ that is consistent with the Bayesian result, whereas the 3L1S model yields $μ_{\rm rel} \geqslant 18.9\, \rm mas\, yr^{-1}$, which is more than three times larger than that of a typical disk object of $\sim 6\, \rm mas\, yr^{-1}$ and thus is not consistent with the Bayesian result. This suggests that the event is likely caused by the binary-lens binary-source model.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_20914
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle KMT-2022-BLG-0086: Another binary-lens binary-source microlensing event
Chung, Sun-Ju
Hwang, Kyu-Ha
Yee, Jennifer C.
Gould, Andrew
Bond, Ian A.
Yang, Hongjing
Albrow, Michael D.
Jung, Youn Kil
Han, Cheongho
Ryu, Yoon-Hyun
Shin, In-Gu
Shvartzvald, Yossi
Zang, Weicheng
Cha, Sang-Mok
Kim, Dong-Jin
Kim, Seung-Lee
Lee, Chung-Uk
Lee, Dong-Joo
Lee, Yongseok
Park, Byeong-Gon
Pogge, Richard W.
Abe, Fumio
Bennett, David P.
Bhattacharya, Aparna
Fukui, Akihiko
Hamada, Ryusei
Hirao, Yuki
Silva, Stela Ishitani
Koshimoto, Naoki
Miyazaki, Shota
Muraki, Yasushi
Nagai, Tutumi
Nunota, Kansuke
Olmschenk, Greg
Ranc, Clément
Rattenbury, Nicholas J.
Satoh, Yuki
Sumi, Takahiro
Suzuki, Daisuke
Terry, Sean K.
Tristram, Paul J.
Vandorou, Aikaterini
Yama, Hibiki
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics of Galaxies
We present the analysis of a microlensing event KMT-2022-BLG-0086 of which the overall light curve is not described by a binary-lens single-source (2L1S) model, which suggests the existence of an extra lens or an extra source. We found that the event is best explained by the binary-lens binary-source (2L2S) model, but the 2L2S model is only favored over the triple-lens single-source (3L1S) model by $Δχ^{2} \simeq 9$. Although the event has noticeable anomalies around the peak of the light curve, they are not enough covered to constrain the angular Einstein radius $θ_{\rm E}$, thus we only measure the minimum angular Einstein radius $θ_{\rm E,min}$. From the Bayesian analysis, it is found that that the binary lens system is a binary star with masses of $(m_1,m_2)=(0.46^{+0.35}_{-0.25}\, M_\odot, 0.75^{+0.67}_{-0.55}\, M_\odot)$ at a distance of $D_{\rm L}=5.87^{+1.21}_{-1.79}$ kpc, while the triple lens system is a brown dwarf or a massive giant planet in a low-mass binary-star system with masses of $(m_1,m_2,m_3)=(0.43^{+0.41}_{-0.35}\, M_\odot, 0.056^{+0.055}_{-0.047}\, M_\odot, 20.84^{+20.20}_{-17.04}\, M_{\rm J})$ at a distance of $D_{\rm L}=4.06^{+1.39}_{-3.28}$ kpc, indicating a disk lens system. The 2L2S model yields the relative lens-source proper motion of $μ_{\rm rel} \geqslant 4.6\, \rm mas\, yr^{-1}$ that is consistent with the Bayesian result, whereas the 3L1S model yields $μ_{\rm rel} \geqslant 18.9\, \rm mas\, yr^{-1}$, which is more than three times larger than that of a typical disk object of $\sim 6\, \rm mas\, yr^{-1}$ and thus is not consistent with the Bayesian result. This suggests that the event is likely caused by the binary-lens binary-source model.
title KMT-2022-BLG-0086: Another binary-lens binary-source microlensing event
topic Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Astrophysics of Galaxies
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20914