Coherent six-functor formalisms: Pro vs Solid

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Ren, Fei
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866910235433631744
author Ren, Fei
author_facet Ren, Fei
contents In the classical theory for coherent sheaves, the only missing piece in the Grothendieck six-functor formalism picture is $j_!$ for an open immersion $j$. Towards fixing this gap, Deligne proposed a construction of $j_!$ by extending the sheaf class to pro sheaves, while Clausen-Scholze provided another solution by extending the sheaf class to solid modules. In this work, we prove that Deligne's construction coincides with the Clausen-Scholze construction via a natural functor, whose restriction to the full subcategory of Mittag-Leffler pro-systems is fully faithful.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_21082
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Coherent six-functor formalisms: Pro vs Solid
Ren, Fei
Algebraic Geometry
General Topology
In the classical theory for coherent sheaves, the only missing piece in the Grothendieck six-functor formalism picture is $j_!$ for an open immersion $j$. Towards fixing this gap, Deligne proposed a construction of $j_!$ by extending the sheaf class to pro sheaves, while Clausen-Scholze provided another solution by extending the sheaf class to solid modules. In this work, we prove that Deligne's construction coincides with the Clausen-Scholze construction via a natural functor, whose restriction to the full subcategory of Mittag-Leffler pro-systems is fully faithful.
title Coherent six-functor formalisms: Pro vs Solid
topic Algebraic Geometry
General Topology
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.21082